breathalyzers might foster competition,

DWI law. All of

Erker, Norton, Hare, Angles L.L.C. Attorneys at Law: Kansas DUI Lawyers and Missouri DWI Lawyers Kansas DUI & Missouri DWI Traffic Defense Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles L.L.C. handles Kansas DUI , Missouri DWI , and other traffic defense cases in Kansas and Missouri. Thomas J. Erker is a founding member of the National College for DUI Defense which holds its annual seminars at Harvard Law School each summer. Jay Norton,J. Ryan Hare, and Christopher J. Angles are all members of the National College for DUI Defense . A person is not guilty of a drinking and driving violation just because he or she is charged with one. The government is required to prove the truth of its allegation beyond a reasonable doubt. The fallacy behind some of the assumptions common in DUI cases, including the accuracy of "field sobriety tests" and breath tests, can be exposed by knowledgeable lawyers. These cases are unique in the criminal justice system and require skilled and experienced lawyers that provide knowledgeable counsel. A charge of DUI in Kansas or DWI in Missouri can have serious ramifications on a defendant's driver's license, criminal record and ability to function in society. The right attorney will make a difference. Important information regarding Kansas MINOR IN POSSESION... Please fill out our electronic form and submit it to Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles L.L.C. for a free evaluation from one of our attorneys regarding your defense in a Kansas DUI or a Missouri DWI case. If you have scheduled a consultation with Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, LLC, please download our client questionnaire and take a moment to fill it out as completely as you can. By completing the questionnaire prior to the meeting and bringing it with you to our offices, you will spend less time in our waiting room and more time in consultation with one of our attorneys. Our law firm has put together a comprehensive overview concerning Kansas DUI law, and have recently added an overview concerning Missouri DWI law. All of our attorneys work in the state of Kansas. Additionally, J. Ryan Hare and Christopher J. Angles handle DWI and traffic offenses in Missouri. It is important to understand that the law and procedure in each state is different. After reviewing the material specific to Kansas DUI or Missouri DUI/DWI, please feel free to contact our law firm by email or telephone with any questions you may have. If you have received a Kansas DUI, you should read the "Brief Guide to Kansas DUI Law" . If you have received a Missouri DWI, you should read the "Brief Guide to Missouri DWI Law" . DUI Exceptions to the United States Constitution FREE evaluation regarding your Kansas DUI or Missouri DWI case Finding a DUI Attorney Outside of Kansas or Missouri top of page DUI DWI & TRAFFIC LAW Guide to Kansas DUI Law Guide to Missouri DWI Law Kansas Minor in Possesion Drug Recognition and Zero Tolerance Laws Finding a DUI Attorney Outside of Kansas or Missouri Kansas DUI & Missouri DWI Blog New Choosing a Kansas DUI Attorney Choosing a Missouri DWI Lawyer Missouri DUI versus DWI CRIMINAL DEFENSE Misdemeanors & Felonies in State & Municipal Court Federal Criminal Defense DOMESTIC LAW Divorce,Child Custody, Paternity and other Domestic Relations case PERSONAL INJURY Includes Medical Malpractice DOWNLOAD CLIENT QUESTIONNAIRE NOTICE: This web site is for informational purposes only. The law firm of Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C., has offices located in Kansas and Missouri. None of the information contained in the Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C. website should be construed as legal advice and it does not create an attorney-client relationship between the viewer and Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C. absent an express agreement between the law firm and the viewer.The members of our firm have extensive experience as Kansas DUI lawyers and Missouri DWI lawyers. The members of the firm are also well known in the community as Kansas criminal defense attorneys, Missouri criminal defense attorneys and federal criminal defense attorneys. The Guide to Kansas DUI Law and Guide to Missouri DWI Law do not constitute legal advice and may or may not accurately represent the current state of the law on those subjects as laws change frequently. Every legal matter is different and the information in these pages may not be applicable to any one specific case. The viewer should neither take nor refrain from taking any action on the basis of any information on this Web site without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. The receipt of an email from our law firm, even in a response to a specific question, does not create an attorney-client relationship and no email exchange should be considered confidential. All attorneys at Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C. are licensed in the state of Kansas. Attorneys J. Ryan Hare and Christopher J. Angles are licensed in Missouri as well. None of the information in this Web site pertains to any states other than Kansas and Missouri and should not be construed as solicitation of business in those or any other states. Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C. specifically disclaims any warranties of services this Web site may seem to offer. If you are unclear about the terms of this disclaimer, the accuracy of any information on the website, or if you have a Kansas DUI, Missouri DUI, federal, state or municipal criminal charge in Kansas or Missouri, a personal injury case in Kansas or Missouri, or a domestic relations case in Kansas, please feel free to contact our law form for further information. © 2006 Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C . All rights reserved.

Daily Nebraskan - STAFF EDITORIAL: Bar breathalyzers might foster competition, not safety Thursday January 26, 2006 Interact: TheDirectory Front Page News Sports Opinion Arts Extra About us Advertising DN Alumni Classifieds E-mail Lists DN Mall Archives Search News options OPINION COLLIN W. SULLIVAN: Bush unlikely to tell truth on torture in address LETTERS TO THE EDITOR, 1/26/2006 SCHUMANN'S VIEW, 1/26/2006 STAFF EDITORIAL: Budget shortfall could be political blessing Sign Up for the Daily Nebraskan News Update (enter email address) Sports News more info privacy policy Search WWW Searchunl.edu STAFF EDITORIAL: Bar breathalyzers might foster competition, not safety October 05, 2005 safety Last week the Daily Nebraskan reported on the growing trend of putting breathalyzers in bars. Bars in some cities such as Boulder, Colo., have breathalyzers by the door. The idea is that people leaving can test their blood-alcohol level before getting behind the wheel. While a noble attempt to curb a disturbingly large national problem, it seems to take only one step forward and two back. Although it may convince a few people now and again to flag a cab or give the keys to a friend, it presents an even more disturbing issue: drinking for sport. These machines quantify how plastered bar patrons are. There’s a high likelihood these breathalyzers, in a place like O Street, would tempt some drinkers to try to get a high score by shooting air into a plastic tube instead of shooting darts at a plastic board. Despite the potential to sell more drinks to college students shooting to blow a .20, many O Street owners don’t like the idea of breathalyzers in their bars, so they’re not likely to catch on here too quickly. And that’s a good thing. After all, it shouldn’t be a digital read-out that gives you the no-go to drive. Bar patrons should be responsible enough to know after more than a couple, it’s time to turn the keys over or call a cab. And if they’re still not certain, they probably shouldn’t be driving anyway. Last year Lincoln averaged about 4.5 drunk driving tickets and just less than one drunk driving accident per day, according to Lincoln Police Department records. That’s 270 completely unnecessary and likely preventable accidents. But it shouldn’t be public breathalyzers that prevent those tickets and accidents. It should be the driver who prevents it from happening before he of she even takes a sip of beer or shot of whiskey. As the popularity of these beer-o-meters spreads across the country, it should stir up more talk about how to prevent drunk driving. The sobering discussion should steer toward solutions like more taxi cabs for patrons to use and bar-issued vouchers to prevent early-morning parking tickets being given to people who made the right decision the night before. Installing breathalyzers, though they transfer some responsibility to patrons, would be blowing an opportunity for Lincoln to address its larger problems surrounding bar patronage.     STAFF EDITORIAL: Bar breathalyzers might foster competition, not safety Post your feedback on this topic here 10/05/2005 Last year, my small town had this... James 10/05/2005 Instead of showing a digital readout... Kevin 10/07/2005 We have breathalyzers in some of our... Michael 10/08/2005 The premise that breathalyzers will... Elias Shedd 10/08/2005 There is nothing wrong with drinking... mike 10/08/2005 This is comical! It ranks right in... Society to Ban Quarters 10/09/2005 "Bar patrons should be responsible... Paul (Feedback requires a Javascript-compatible browser) Enter city, state, or zip. | Front Page | News | Sports | Opinion | Arts | Arts : CD reviews | Extra : Wedding Guide | About us | Advertising | DN Alumni | Classifieds | E-mail Lists | DN Mall | Archives | © 2006 Daily Nebraskan Advertise on the New Digital Group College Newspaper Network

DUI Insurance

New Jersey DWI Guide: Car Insurance Everything You Need to Know About First Offender DUI / DWI, Drinking Driving and Drugs Home | State By State Help | DUI Lawyers | Insurance Help | Breath Testers | DUI Videos Other States New Jersey Topics New Jersey DWI New Jersey Car Insurance New Jersey DWI Lawyers Google Search Results New Jersey Car Insurance Since 1993, InsureMe has helped countless consumers save money on their auto insurance. Fast, easy and free. With our free service, enter your information once and you are instantly matched with the most competitive companies in the business. You'll get back up to five quotes so you can compare and save. At InsureMe, we shop your insurance so you don't have to. Your privacy is important to us. At InsureMe, we use the highest level of security available to safeguard your personal information. We hate spam just as much as you do, so we'll never sell or rent your email address for mass marketing. Why not get started today? Get Quote Now Home > State By State Help > New Jersey DWI > Car Insurance DISCLAIMER : This website provides only general information intended for those charged with drunk driving offenses. The information and news items on the site are for information only. This information is not legal advice, nor is it intended to create any binding advisory relationship. Do not take action based upon this information unless you consult with an attorney or other specialist. © 2005 Drivers Research Institute   All Rights Reserved   Send eMail   Advertise With Us

drunk driving" or "driving

California DUI Laws and Lawyer Guide California DUI Laws and DUI Lawyers California DUI Laws Felony DUI Probable Cause Presumption of BAC when Driving DUI Double Jeopardy CA DUI Penalties Home Detention Enhanced Penalties Finding A Good DUI Attorney License Suspensions California DMV Administrative Hearing Implied Consent The Officer's Warning Driving Symptoms Driving Studies Field Sobriety Tests Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Validity of FSTs Breath-Alcohol Odor Blood-Alcohol Tests Breathalyzer Tests BAC Testing Machines Blood-Alcohol Levels Tolerance to Alcohol Miranda Advisements Insurance After a DUI DUI Search Help Home © 2002 All Rights Reserved "California DUI Laws and DUI Lawyers" , is a complete source of information about California DUI laws , California DUI attorneys and lawyers, penalties for driving under the influence, California DMV driver's license suspensions, breath alcohol tests, criminal courts, car insurance after a DUI California arrest and police investigative procedures. California DUI offers everything you need to know if you are arrested in California for driving under the influence of alcohol ( DUI ) — sometimes referred to as "drunk driving" or "driving while intoxicated" ( DWI ) — including answers to such common questions as: What crimes will I be charged with for a DUI in California ? What are the possible penalties for driving under the influence of alcohol ? Who are the best drunk driving lawyers in California? How can I save my driver's license ? How do those field sobriety tests work? Are those breath tests accurate? How can I estimate my blood-alcohol level ? What if I have a high tolerance to alcohol ? What happens if the police didn't read me my Miranda rights? What happens to my car insurance ? How can I get my driving record ? "What should I do if I'm stopped for drunk driving?" Nationally-known Southern California DUI attorney Lawrence Taylor, author of the legal textbook Drunk Driving Defense , 6th edition , offers 5 tips: Politely decline to answer questions without an attorney (only incriminating answers will be in the police report). Decline to take any field sobriety tests (not required by law and rarely helps you). Unless you are under 21, decline to take any handheld breath test not required by law. Agree to take a required "evidentiary" breath test (blood test if confident you are under .08%). Make sure your attorney calls the DMV Driver Safety Office within 10 days and demands a hearing to contest your license suspension. "Should I just plead guilty?" Atlanta attorney William C. Head, one of the foremost authorities in the country, explains the 5 myths and realities of defending against DWI charges today: Most people accused of this crime are guilty. Drunk driving is a minor offense. Any attorney can defend a person accused of DUI. These cases can't be won. DUI cases are just like any other criminal case. California DUI Attorneys Resource Center California-oriented legal megasite for lawyers and laymen, containing information and over 600 links. The Great .08 Debate Excellent discussion of the .08% blood-alcohol controversy, from noted New York attorney Ed Fiandach. MADD and Madder: Today's DUI Defense Bar is More Focused and Aggressive Than Ever Before Interesting article in the "American Bar Association Journal" reporting on the counter-offensive from increasingly specialized and technically sophisticated DWI Lawyers. The DUI Exception to the Constitution The continuing erosion of fairness and constitutional rights in drunk driving cases, from a lecture by a former Fulbright Professor of Law and nationally-known California DUI attorney. DUI Blog Commentary on the defects, fallacies and Constitutional damage of the "war on drunk driving". Southern California DUI Lawyers Helpful legal information from an 8-attorney law firm practicing DUI defense exclusively in Los Angeles , Orange County , Riverside and San Diego . DUI Resource Library for Judges Online links and materials for judges nationwide in understanding and dealing with drunk driving cases. FindLaw Nationwide resource for DUI issues generally. California DUI : A Drunk Driving Law Guide is intended to counter the political pressures of extremist groups such as MADD seeking the passage of unfair laws , the erosion of constitutional rights and the eventual return of prohibition. The National Motorists Association sets forth its positions on controversial drunk driving issues, such as unconstitutional roadblocks, overemphasis on breath alcohol tests, unfair criminal penalties and the imposition of "automatic" license suspensions. " Responsibility in DUI Laws, Inc. ", is an organization dedicated to reforming harsh and misdirected DUI laws. Please visit our local DUI information websites for Los Angeles County , Orange County , San Diego County , Riverside County and Ventura County . Websites for the following counties are under construction or in the planning stages: San Bernardino, Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Imperial, Marin, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Sacramento, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz and Sonoma. Site Map | Link to Us Legal Disclaimer

First DUI › DUI

Washington DUI LAW › Free Consultation Find a DUI LAWS Lawyer :: Select Your State :: Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington DC West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming › About 1800 DUI LAWS › DUI Laws by State › DUI Arrests by State › Drinking and Driving › Your First DUI › DUI Drugs › DUI Laws Dictionary › BAC Calculator › Field Sobriety Tests › Driver License › The Science › Breathalyzers › Jail Alternatives › Ignition Interlock › Criminal Courts › Designated Drivers › DUI Insurance › DUI Schools › Tell a Friend //-- › Order Your DMV Record › Link to DUI LAWS › Contact Us › Why Expungement? › Expungement 101 › Felony Expungement › Rehabilitation & Pardon › Case Evaluation › Traffic School Info › About The Content › About The Quizzes › About The Final Exam › Student Comments › DUI Chat › For Attorneys Only › Website Development Washington DUI LAW Choose your Washington county to locate a DUI LAW Lawyer in your area. :: Select a County :: Adams County Asotin County Benton County Chelan County Clallam County Clark County Columbia County Cowlitz County Douglas County Ferry County Franklin County Garfield County Grant County Grays Harbor County Island County Jefferson County King County Kitsap County Kittitas County Klickitat County Lewis County Lincoln County Mason County Okanogan County Pacific County Pend Oreille County Pierce County San Juan County Skagit County Skamania County Snohomish County Spokane County Stevens County Thurston County Wahkiakum County Walla Walla County Whatcom County Whitman County Yakima County Washington counties - map view Washington drunk driving cases are most commonly referred to as DUI or driving under the influence and sometimes DWI – Driving While Intoxicated. Washington does have a "per se" law, meaning that you may be convicted of a DUI in Washington if you drive with an alcohol level of .08 or greater. If someone is arrested for drunk driving, DUI or DWI, refusal to take a chemical test can be used against them in court, and also result in harsher penalties in court and with their driving privilege . The washout period for prior drunk driving convictions is 7 years . NOTE: The Seattle Municipal Court has special rules, and demands special attention: top The Seattle Municipal Court one of the busiest courts in Washington, and has many unique policies and procedures related to DUI arrests. It is extremely important to retain a qualified DUI / DWI defense lawyer who is familiar with the prosecutors and local practices. To find a local drunk driving defense lawyer, choose your county from either the county map at the top right of this page or form the county drop-down at the top left of this page. IMMEDIATE APPEARANCE Most courts take up to a month or more to file your case; not Seattle. If you are arrested for a DUI in Seattle, you will be required to appear in Court within 48 hours of the next business day. FIRST APPEARANCE PRETRIAL RELEASE POLICIES - BAIL In most courthouses, the prosecutors do not seek to increase bail at the first court appearance. However, Seattle prosecutors usually request substantial bail and pretrial release conditions on ALL DUI cases , which can include such things as attending AA classes, the immediate installation of ignition interlock devices, and abstinence from all alcohol . top Oftentimes, those (alleged DUI offenders) who appear unrepresented find themselves taken to jail immediately until they can post bail. NO PERSONAL CHECKS OR CREDIT CARDS ARE ACCEPTED TO PAY FOR YOUR BAIL. Instead, you'll have to sit in jail until arrangements can be made. It is critical that an experienced DUI / DWI lawyer represent you to ensure your immediate release. Punishment in Criminal Court First DUI Offense/ no prior DUI offense in the last 7 years and breath test under .15% or no breath test but not a refusal. One day in jail minimum, one year maximum OR 15 days Electronic Home Detection $823 total minimum fine, up to $5,000 fine 90 day license suspension SR-22 Proof of Insurance Probationary license for 5 years after reinstatement Up to five years monitored probation Ignition interlock may be ordered by the court (Min. time not specified) up to 5 years Alcohol evaluation and treatment as determined by the court (up to two years) Probation monitoring (and fees) for up to five years First DUI Offense/ no prior DUI offense in the last 7 years and breath test .15% or higher or refusal to take breath test. 2 days in jail minimum, 1 year maximum OR 30 days Electronic Home Detention $1078 total minimum, up to $5,000 fine One year license revocation SR-22 Insurance Probationary License for 5 years after reinstatement Up to five years monitored probation Ignition interlock not less than one year Alcohol evaluation and treatment as determined by the court (up to 2 years) Probation monitoring (and fees) for up to 5 years One prior DUI Offense in the last 7 years and breath test under .15% or no breath test but not a refusal. 30 days in jail minimum, one year maximum, PLUS 60 days Electronic Home Detention $1078 total minimum, up to $5,000 fine Two year license revocation Driving and knowledge exams SR-22 Insurance Probationary license for 5 years after reinstatement Up to five years monitored probation Ignition interlock for one year (if no previous interlock) Alcohol evaluation and treatment as determined by the court (up to two years) Probation monitoring (and fees) for up to five years One prior DUI Offense in the last 7 years and breath test .15% or higher or refusal to take breath test. 45 days in jail minimum, one year maximum, PLUS 90 days Electronic Home Detention $1,503 total minimum, up to $5,000 fine 900 day license revocation Driving and knowledge exam SR-22 Insurance Probationary license for 5 years Up to five years monitored probation Ignition interlock not less than one year (if no previous interlock) Alcohol evaluation and treatment as determined by the court (up to two years) Probation monitoring (and fees) for up to five years Two Prior DUI Offenses in the last 7 years and breathe test under .15% or no breath test but not a refusal. 90 days in jail minimum, 1 year maximum, PLUS 120 days Electronic Home Detention $1,928 total minimum, up to $5,000 fine Three year license revocation Driving and knowledge exams SR-22 Insurance Probationary license for 5 years after reinstatement Up to five years monitored probation Ignition interlock for 1 year if no previous interlock, 5 years if a previous interlock, 10 years if two previous interlocks Alcohol evaluation and treatment as determined by the court (up to two years) Probation monitoring (and fees) for up to five years Two Prior DUI Offenses in the last 7 years and breath test .15% or higher or refusal to take breath test. 120 days in jail minimum, 1 year maximum, 150 days Electronic Home Detention $2,778 total minimum, up to $5,000 fine Four year license revocation Driving and knowledge exams SR-22 Insurance Probationary license for 5 years Up to 5 years monitored probation Ignition interlock not less than 1 year if no previous interlock, 5 years if a previous interlock; 10 years if two previous interlocks Alcohol evaluation and treatment as determined by the court (up to 2 years) Probation monitoring (and fees) for up to 5 years top DMV Penalties Breath Test .08 or Higher 90 day license suspension. Two year license revocation if second or subsequent administrative action within seven years. License is marked for 60 days. 30 days to request hearing $100 hearing fee unless indigent Hearing within 60 days of arrest $150 reissue fee SR-22 Insurance required 3 years thereafter Occupational/Restricted License is available after 30 days on first offense, one year on second and subsequent DUI's top Refusal To Take A Breath Test One year license revocation if refused the test and no prior administrative actions within seven years. Two year license revocation if second or subsequent administrative action (refusal or breath test over legal limit) within seven years. License is marked for 60 days 30 days to request hearing $100 hearing fee Hearing within 60 days of arrest $150 reissue fee SR-22 Insurance required 3 years thereafter One year license revocation even if driver enters into a deferred prosecution Occupational/Restricted License is available after 90 days on first offense, one year on second and subsequent DUI's Washington drivers are able to check their driver's license status online by CLICKING HERE . top Circumstantial Evidence The difference between direct and circumstantial evidence is critical to understand in drunk driving and DUI cases. Direct evidence refers to those things that are directly observed. Circumstantial evidence refers to inferences that can be drawn from other items of evidence. For example, if a witness sees water falling from the sky, that observation is direct evidence that it is raining. However, if a witness walks outside in the morning, sees puddles on the ground, sees water rushing through the rain gutters, sees water beaded up on the car, those observations are circumstantial evidence that it has rained. DUI cases are entirely circumstantial. Evidence of poor driving, evidence of substandard Field Sobriety Tests, evidence of red and watery eyes and the odor of alcohol on the breath, these are all circumstantial evidence of impairment. Likewise, the chemical test evidence is circumstantial evidence. It is illegal to drive above the legal limit; it is not illegal to be above the legal limit at the time of testing, which is usually at least a half-hour after driving. The later chemical test is merely circumstantial evidence of what the alcohol level was at the time of driving. If the accused gave a breath or blood test while driving, that would be direct evidence. Because of the passage of time, the evidence is, instead, circumstantial evidence. top Reasonable Doubt Every defendant in a criminal case (DUI included) is entitled to put the prosecution to its proof, and, unless the prosecution convinces the finder of fact (jury, or judge in states that do not allow jury trials for drunk driving cases) that defendant's guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant is entitled to a judgment of not guilty. Every lawyer has his or her own way of describing this level of proof. It is the highest burden known in the law. :: Previous page :: :: top :: | Site map | Terms and Conditions | Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Contact us at 1 800 DUI LAWS | 1 800 DUI LAWS. All rights reserved.