 |
Illinois DUI Laws,Criminal Laws Illinois DWILaws DUI DWI: International Referral Database of DUI, DWI, Impairedand DrunkDriving, Drinking and Driving, Lawyers & Attorneys State orProvince | County | Region | Attorneys | Courthouses | License & Traffic Offices | Legislation | Instruments | Standards | Experts | Articles Add Attorney | Add Courthouse | AddDMV Office | Add Legislation | AddInstrument | Add Standards Home | Debate | AddingYour Firm | Words are used in Canada? DUI | DWI | DrunkDriving | Drinkingand Driving | DUI Laws | DWILaws | Ontariodui | Ontario dui laws | ImpairedDriving | TorontoDUI | BramptonDUI | MississaugaDUI DUI : Driving Under the Influence; DWI : Driving While Intoxicated;OUI: Operating Under the Inflence; OWI: Operating While Intoxicated; ImpairedDriving: Impaired in Canada to Slightest Degree; Over 80: Excess BAC alcohol inCanada over 80 mg/100mL; Care or Control: Occupy seat normallyoccupied by operator in Canada, act or series of acts involving useof car , fittings or equipment Sponsored by: Your Banner Here Case Briefs www.casebriefs.net D atabase F or C anadian C riminal L aw | Summariesof DUI Law DWI Law Illinois | Law | FirstAppearance | Practice Descriptions | Local Data | Courthouses | Licenses Law Offices of Michael Baker , IL DUI Law, DWI Laws A first-time DUI is normally charged as a misdemeanor, not a felony. A first offender can receive court supervision, only once, which is not a conviction on any public record. The criminal case is dismissed after successful completion of court supervision, but can't be expunged from the public record. But if someone suffers great bodily harm as a result of the drunken driving Illinois will raise the charge to a felony. And if the victim dies, Illinois may charge the driver with reckless homicide. Illinois will charge a third DUI as a felony. If you are arrested for Driving Under the Influence (alcohol, drugs or combination thereof) and fail a blood alcohol level test (.08) or refuse to submit to a test, your license will be suspended starting 46 days after the arrest. Before the suspension starts, you may request to have a hearing in court which will stop the suspension. Also, you may be eligible for a Judicial Driving Permit license for work or medical reasons while your license is suspended. DUI CONVICTION: Driving underthe influence of alcohol and/or any other drug(s) or intoxicating compound(s) that endanger safe driving will cause mandatory revocation of your driver's license, plus criminal penalties of up to 364 days in jail and a fine up to $2,500. If you are convicted of a DUI, your driver's license and driving privileges will be revoked for a minimum of one year for the first offense, five years for a second offense committed within a 20-year period, and 10 years for a third or subsequent offense. However, if you are under age 21 at the time of the DUI conviction, your driver's license and driving privileges will be revoked for a minimum of two years for your first offense; for five years or until your 21st birthday, whichever is longer, for your second offense; and for 10 years for a third or subsequent offense. If you meet conditions set by the Secretary of State, you can get a restricted driving permit, good for 1 year, that generally allows driving only between 5 a.m. and 9 p.m. After that, you can apply for (but are not assured of getting) a regular driver's license. Those are the penalties for a first offense. For a second offense within 20 years, the same criminal penalties apply, your license will be revoked, and you cannot apply for another license for 5 years. You can also be sentenced to 48 hours in jail or 10 days of community service. For a third conviction, which is a class 4 felony, you can be imprisoned up to 3 years and fined up to $25,000; your license will be revoked; and you cannot apply for another one for 10 years. For a fourth offense, you can be imprisoned up to 3 years, fined up to $25,000, and can NEVER AGAIN legally drive. Fagan, Fagan & Davis , IL DUI Law, DWI Laws DUI in general is punishable by up to 364 days in jail, and up to $2500 in fines. First offenders are eligible for supervision (not a conviction), the legal breath limit is 0.08 for alcohol, and any amount of intoxicating drug or compound in blood. A conviction results in automatic revocation (permanent deprivation) of driving priviliges in Illinois. See our website for further information. Law Firm , IL DUI Law, DWI Laws - Ramsell & Armamentos, L.L.C. , IL DUI Law, DWI Laws In Illinois, normally a first offender DUI can be dismissed following successful completion of DUI classes, payment of fines, and other conditions of court. First offenders MAY lose thier licenses from 90 to 180 days, but a license suspension can be challenged; or a work permit can be obtained. Ramsell & Armamentos, L.L.C. , IL DUI Law, DWI Laws DUI law in Illinois ranges from a misdemeanor to a felony, depending on the prior record of the accused and the facts of the case. Also, an upfront suspension ranging from 90 days to three years may occur. All aspects of the case can be challenged in court. The legal presumption of guilt occurs at .08 or any amount of a controlled substance. Law Offices of Harold L. Wallin , IL DUI Law, DWI Laws Anyone convicted of a DUI in Illinos will have his or her license revoked (However, first time offenders can avoid this by receiving court supervision). Also, any Illinois motorist who receives a DUI conviction, while in another compact state, will have his or her Illinois license revoked, regardless of the consequences of a DUI conviction in the state of arrest. 4853 | DUI DWI Practice Descriptions, Links, andProfiles | DUI DWI Summaries of Law | Searchby Region, County, City | First Appearance inDUI Court DWI Court | MembersOnly | AddYour Firm | Delete | Privacy | For Ontario DUIDWI impaired driving criminal law information please visit www.lawyers.ca See also TorontoDUI For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: AllbissLawdata Ltd. , 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga,Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4. Theauthor and the participants make no representation or warranty whatsoeveras to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.Advertisement.Theselawyers do not practice in association. WARNING: All informationcontained herein is provided for the purpose of providing basic information onlyand should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any andall liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are stronglyencouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of theinformation contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from aproperly retained lawyer or attorney.
|
|
D.W.I.Deutsche Weine | Home 26.01.06 . 21:40 Home | Wir ber uns | Sitemap | Impressum | English Deutscher Wein international Großbritannien Belgien Niederlande Schweden Dänemark USA Kanada Japan Norwegen Finnland Suche 08.09.05 | Wenig bekannt Rotweinspezialitäten Drei weniger bekannte Rotweinspezialitten, St. Laurent, Frhburgunder und Samtrot, haben wir fr dieses Probierpaket ausgewhlt. News & Aktuelles Alles ber deutschen Wein Wein & Kulinarisches Tourismus & Events Specials Weinseminare Shop Links Presse Weinwirtschaft intern Dozenten Login 09.01.06 | Top Thema Feiern wo der Wein wächst Broschren des Deutschen Weininstituts informieren ber rund 1.000 Feste und Events rund um den Wein. Seit nunmehr ber 25 Jahren sind die Broschren Deutsche Winzerfeste und Messen, Seminare, Veranstaltungen die Renner im Servicesortiment des Deutschen Weininstituts (DWI). Viele Tausend der kostenlosen Exemplare werden alljhrlich vom DWI verschickt. Die Auflage 2006 hat einen neues Design bekommen. Frische, moderne Motive zeigen die deutschen Weinbaugebiete von ihrer schnsten Seite. Nach Anbaugebieten und Monaten sortiert, findet man schnell alle Feste, die von Januar bis November in den idyllischen Weindrfern zwischen Bodensee und Ahr sowie Elbe und Saar zum geselligen Genuss einladen. Insgesamt sind ber tausend Wein- und Winzerfeste in der kleinen Lektre Deutsche Winzerfeste im praktischen DIN-lang-Format auf mehr als 60 Seiten zusammengefasst. 10.01.06 | Aktuelle Pressemeldung Winzerberuf wird immer beliebter Die Ausbildungszahlen sind im Jahr 2005 stark gestiegen 09.01.06 | Fußballweltmeisterschaft 2006 Die FIFA WM 2006 – Eine Steilvorlage für die deutsche Weinwirtschaft 50 Erzeuger mit WM-Weinen im Angebot / Deutsche Weine exklusiv in den VIP-Bereichen der Stadien und auf offiziellen FIFA-Veranstaltungen / Zahlreiche Aktionen rund um Wein & Fuball 03.11.05 | Buchtipp Riesling–Die ganze Vielfalt der edelsten Rebe der Welt Ein umfassender berblick ber Rebe, Qualitt, Klassifizierung, Aromen und die verschiedenen Riesling-Typen. 17.01.06 | Aus Weinberg & Keller Eisweinlese 2005 bei Vollmond abgeschlossen Eiswein vom Jahrgang 2005 ist eine echte Raritt. Da die Erntemengen im Herbst in fast allen Anbauten geringer ausgefallen waren, als im langjhrigen Mittel, lieen sich nicht viele Winzer auf den Eiswein-Poker ein. 09.12.05 | Deutsche Weine in aller Welt Bestnoten aus USA für deutschen Riesling Robert Parkers Wine Advocate lobt deutsche Weine. Erstmals auch trockene Rieslinge und Rotweine in der Bewertung. Hommage an den Riesling im Wine Spectator 24.01.06 | Wein und Gesundheit Sensi diVini - Die Weinprobe findet im Kopf statt Wir schmecken mit der Zunge, wir riechen mit der Nase - aber ist das wirklich so? Luft nicht vielmehr alles im Kopf ab? 21.09.05 | Der Kalender für Weinfreunde Veranstaltungstipps Finden Sie Termine und Hinweise zu zahlreichen Weinfesten, -seminaren oder Weinmessen. 02.01.06 | Special Rezept des Monats Januar Ochsenschwanzragout mit Kartoffelpltzchen 02.01.06 | Specials Weinquiz Januar 2006 Jeden Monat eine neue Frage und neue Gewinnchancen. Weinglossar 6.200 Begriffe kurz erläutert Suche
|
|
Drunk Driving (MADD) Rating Impaired Driving Facts - NCIPC Impaired Driving More Injury Fact Sheets Impaired Driving Overview Alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes kill someone every 31 minutes and nonfatally injure someone every two minutes (NHTSA 2005). Occurrence and Consequences During 2004, 16,694 people in the U.S. died in alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes, representing 39% of all traffic-related deaths (NHTSA 2005). In 2004, about 1.4 million drivers were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or narcotics (Department of Justice, 2004). Thats less than one percent of the 159 million self-reported episodes of alcoholimpaired driving among U.S. adults each year (Quinlan et al. 2005). Drugs other than alcohol (e.g., marijuana and cocaine) are involved in about 18% of motor vehicle driver deaths. These other drugs are generally used in combination with alcohol (Jones et al. 2003). More than two-thirds of child passengers ages 14 and younger who died in alcohol-related crashes during 19972002 were riding with the drinking driver; only 32% of them were properly restrained at the time of the crash (Shults 2004). Cost Each year, alcohol-related crashes in the United States cost about $51 billion (Blincoe 2002). Groups at Risk Male drivers involved in fatal motor vehicle crashes are almost twice as likely as female drivers to be intoxicated with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or greater (NHTSA 2004b). A BAC of 0.08% is equal to or greater than the legal limit in most states. At all levels of blood alcohol concentration, the risk of being involved in a crash is greater for young people than for older people (Zador 2000). In 2003, 25% of drivers ages 15 to 20 who died in motor vehicle crashes had been drinking alcohol (NHTSA 2004c). Young men ages 18 to 20 (under the legal drinking age) reported driving while impaired almost as frequently as men ages 21 to 34 (Liu 1997). Among motorcycle drivers killed in fatal crashes, 30% have BACs of 0.08% or greater (Paulozzi 2004). Nearly half of the alcohol-impaired motorcyclists killed each year are age 40 or older, and motorcyclists ages 40 to 44 years have the highest percentage of fatalities with BACs of 0.08% or greater (Paulozzi 2004). Of the 2,136 traffic fatalities among children ages 0 to 14 years in 2003, 21% involved alcohol (NHTSA 2004d). Risk Factors Nearly three quarters of those convicted of driving while impaired are either frequent heavy drinkers (alcohol abusers) or alcoholics (alcohol dependent) (Miller 1986). Among drivers involved in fatal crashes, those with BAC levels of 0.08% or higher were nine times more likely to have a prior conviction for driving while impaired (DWI) than were drivers who had not consumed alcohol (NHTSA 2004a). CDC Activities Actions to decrease alcohol-related fatal crashes involving young drivers have been effective Over the past 20 years, alcohol-related fatal crash rates have decreased by 60 percent for drivers ages 16 to 17 years and 55 percent for drivers ages 18 to 20 years. However, this progress has stalled in the past few years. To further decrease alcohol-related fatal crashes among young drivers, communities need to implement and enforce strategies that are known to be effective, such as minimum legal drinking age laws and "zero tolerance" laws for drivers under 21 years of age. Elder RW, Shults RA. Trends in alcohol involvement in fatal motor vehicle crashes among young drivers 1982-2001. MMWR 2002;51:108991. Sobriety checkpoints reduce alcohol-related crashes Fewer alcohol-related crashes occur when sobriety checkpoints are implemented, according to a CDC report published in the December 2002 issue of Traffic Injury Prevention. Sobriety checkpoints are traffic stops where law enforcement officers systematically select drivers to assess their level of alcohol impairment. The goal of these interventions is to deter alcohol-impaired driving by increasing drivers perceived risk of arrest. The conclusion that they are effective in reducing alcohol-related crashes is based on a systematic review of research about sobriety checkpoints. The review was conducted by a team of experts led by CDC scientists, under the oversight of the Task Force on Community Preventive Servicesa 15-member, non-federal group of leaders in various health-related fields. (Visit www.thecommunityguide.org for more information.) The review combined the results of 23 scientifically-sound studies from around the world. Results indicated that sobriety checkpoints consistently reduced alcohol-related crashes, typically by about 20 percent. The results were similar regardless of how the checkpoints were conducted, for short-term blitzes, or when checkpoints were used continuously for several years. This suggests that the effectiveness of checkpoints does not diminish over time. Elder RW, Shults RA, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Zaza S, Thompson RS. Effectiveness of sobriety checkpoints for reducing alcohol-involved crashes. Traffic Inj Prev 2002;3:266-74. Stronger state DUI prevention activities may reduce alcohol-impaired driving Strong state activities designed to prevent driving under the influence (DUI), including legislation, enforcement, and education, may reduce the incidence of drinking and driving, according to a study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). For the study, which was published in the June 2002 issue of Injury Prevention, CDC analyzed data from the 1997 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national telephone survey, and the Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) Rating the States 2000 survey, that graded states on their DUI countermeasures from 1996-1999. Results showed that residents of states with a MADD grade of "D" were 60 percent more likely to report alcohol-impaired driving than were residents from states with a MADD grade of "A." MADD based the grades on 11 categories of prevention measures, including DUI legislation; political leadership; statistics and records availability; resources devoted to enforcing DUI laws; administrative penalties and criminal sanctions; regulatory control and alcohol availability; youth DUI legislation; prevention and education; and victim compensation and support. The study also found that 4 percent of the residents who consume alcohol reported they had driven after having too much to drink at least once during the previous month. Men were nearly three times as likely as women to report alcohol-impaired driving, and single people were about 50 percent more likely to report alcohol-impaired driving than married people or those living with a partner. Shults RA, Sleet DA, Elder RW, Ryan GW, Sehgal M. Association between state-level drinking and driving countermeasures and self-reported alcohol-impaired driving. Inj Prev 2002;8:10610. Research leads to bills that protect children from drinking drivers CDCs findings about the number of children killed in cars driven by drinking drivers has led legislators in several states to introduce bills to help protect them from drinking drivers. Such legislation creates special penalties under state child abuse laws for persons who transport children while driving drunk. Results from the study showed that nearly two-thirds of children killed in drinking driver-related crashes were riding with the impaired driver. Fewer than 20 percent of the children killed were properly restrained at the time of the crash, and restraint use decreased as the drivers blood alcohol concentration increased. Quinlan KP, Brewer RD, Sleet DA, Dellinger AM. Child passenger deaths and injuries involving drinking drivers. JAMA 2000:283(17):224952. Research identifies effective interventions against alcohol-impaired driving CDC and the Task Force on Community Preventive Servicesan independent, nonfederal panel of community health expertspublished systematic reviews of the literature for five community-based interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. The reviews revealed strong evidence of effectiveness for 0.08% blood alcohol concentration (BAC) laws, minimum legal drinking age laws, and sobriety checkpoints. They also found sufficient evidence of effectiveness for lower BAC laws specific to young or inexperienced drivers (zero tolerance laws) and intervention training programs for alcohol servers. A detailed description of the sobriety checkpoints systematic review was published in the December 2002 issue of Traffic Injury Prevention. The systematic review of the effectiveness of 0.08% BAC laws for drivers was helpful in establishing a 0.08% standard nationwide. The review revealed that state laws that lowered the illegal BAC for drivers from 0.10% to 0.08% reduced alcohol-related fatalities by a median of 7 percent, translating to 500 lives saved annually. With this evidence, the Task Force on Community Preventive Services strongly recommended that all states pass 0.08% BAC laws. In October 2000, the President signed the Fiscal Year 2001 transportation appropriations bill, requiring states to pass the 0.08% BAC law by October 2003 or risk losing federal highway construction funds. As of October 1, 2003, 45 states and the District of Columbia had enacted 0.08% BAC legislation. In June 2001, Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, awarded the Secretarys Award for Distinguished Service to the systematic review team for their contribution to the field. The team is currently conducting systematic reviews of mass media campaigns, school-based education programs, and designated driver programs, which are scheduled for publication in 2004. The Guide to Community Preventive Services Shults RA, Elder RW, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Alao MA, Carande-Kulis VG, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving [published erratum appears in American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2002;23:72]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2001;21(4S):6688. Prevention Strategies Effective measures to prevent injuries and deaths from impaired driving include: Promptly suspending the driver's licenses of people who drive while intoxicated (DeJong 1998). Lowering the permissible levels of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) for adults to 0.08% in all states (Shults 2001). Zero tolerance laws for drivers younger than 21 years old in all states (Shults 2001). Sobriety checkpoints (Shults 2001). Multi-faceted community-based approaches to alcohol control and DUI prevention (Holder 2000, DeJong 1998). Mandatory substance abuse assessment and treatment for driving-under-the-influence offenders (Wells-Parker, 1995). Other suggested measures include: Reducing the legal limit for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) to 0.05% (Howat 1991; National Committee on Injury Prevention and Control 1989). Raising state and federal alcohol excise taxes (National Committee on Injury Prevention and Control 1989). Implementing compulsory blood alcohol testing when traffic crashes result in injury (National Committee on Injury Prevention and Control 1989). References Blincoe L, Seay A, Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Romano E, Luchter S, et al. The Economic Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2000. Washington (DC): Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); 2002. Available from URL: www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/economic/econimpact2000/index.htm Brewer RD , Morris PD, Cole TB, Watkins S, Patetta MJ, Popkin C. The risk of dying in alcohol-related automobile crashes among habitual drunk drivers. New England Journal of Medicine 1994;331:5137. DeJong W. Hingson R. Strategies to reduce driving under the influence of alcohol. Annual Review of Public Health 1998;19:35978. Department of Justice (US), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Crime in the United States 2004: Uniform Crime Reports. Washington (DC): FBI; 2004 [cited November 15, 2005]. Available from URL: www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_04/documents/CIUS2004.pdf . Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic safety facts 2004: alcohol. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2005 [cited 2005 Nov 6]. Available from URL: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2004/809905.pdf . Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic safety facts 2003: children. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2004d [cited 2004 Nov 4]. Available from URL: www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2003/809762.pdf . Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic safety facts 2003: overview. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2004b [cited 2004 Oct 19]. Available from URL: www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2003/809767.pdf . Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic safety facts 2003: young drivers. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2004c [cited 2004 Oct 19]. Available from URL: www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2003/809774.pdf . Holder HD, Gruenewald PJ, Ponicki WR, Treno AJ, Grube JW, Saltz RF, et al. Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000;284:2341-7. Howat P, Sleet D, Smith I. Alcohol and driving: is the .05% blood alcohol concentration limit justified? Drug and Alcohol Review 1991;10(1):15166. Jones RK, Shinar D, Walsh JM. State of knowledge of drug-impaired driving. Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); 2003. Report DOT HS 809 642. Liu S, Siegel PZ, Brewer RD, Mokdad AH, Sleet DA, Serdula M. Prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving. Results from a national self-reported survey of health behaviors. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997;277(2):1225. Miller BA, Whitney R, Washousky R. Alcoholism diagnoses for convicted drinking drivers referred for alcoholism evaluation. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research 1986;10(6):6516. National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control. Injury prevention: meeting the challenge. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1989;5(3 Suppl):1237. Paulozzi LJ, Patel R. Changes in motorcycle crash mortality rates by blood alcohol concentration and age United States, 1983 - 2003. MMWR 2004;53(47):1103-6. Quinlan KP, Brewer RD, Siegel P, Sleet DA, Mokdad AH, Shults RA, Flowers N. Alcohol-impaired driving among U.S. adults, 1993-2002. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005;28(4):345-350. Shults RA. Child passenger deaths involving drinking driversUnited States, 19972002 [published erratum appears in MMWR 2004;53(5):109]. MMWR 2004;53(4):779. Shults RA, Elder RW, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Alao MO, Carande-Kulis VG, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2001;2(4 Suppl):6688. Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, Williams M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction 1995;90:907-26. Zador PL, Krawchuk SA, Voas RB. Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2000;61:387-95. Contact Information National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Mailstop K65 4770 Buford Highway NE Atlanta, GA 30341-3724 Phone: 770.488.1506 Fax: 770.488.1667 Email: OHCINFO@cdc.gov News | Facts | Data | Publications | Funding | Contact Us CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z Privacy Notice - Accessibility This page last reviewed 01/23/06 . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
|
|
DUII and DUI , Attorney, lawyers in Oregon | James F. O'Rourke Jr.| DUI, DUII legal experts If you are looking for an attorney or lawyer in Oregon, the Law Offices of James F. O'Rourke Jr. & Associates, will serve your legal needs in our many practice areas . From DUII and DUI , criminal defense , personal injury & wrongful death , Measure 11 crimes , drug crimes and property crimes to family law and those cases involving alcohol , our attorneys and lawyers cover all cases, all courts, all Counties in Oregon. The communities of Portland and Gresham, Oregon have come to rely on our firm of lawyers and attorneys to provide conscientious, quality legal representation at competitive costs. We achieve this by staying abreast of the constantly changing laws, regulations, and standards of legal practice here in the state of Oregon. Our many clients enjoy the close personal attention our lawyers and attorneys provide, along with the depth & breadth of knowledge that only years of legal experience with the law in Oregon can offer. We recognize that it's difficult to decide which lawyer or attorney in Oregon can best represent you when you need quality legal help and legal advice. Please tell us about your case and we will promptly contact you. We look forward to adding your name to our list of satisfied clients. E-mail: jfo@jfolaw.com Portland Office Suite 710, Yeon Building 522 SW 5th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204 Tel: 503-221-1425 / Fax: 503-221-1497 Gresham Office Suite 1, 748 S.E. 181st Street, Gresham, Oregon 97233 Tel: 503-667-8437 Fax: 503-221-1497 While our principle law offices are in Portland and Gresham, Oregon we also represent persons charged with Measure 11 crimes , domestic violence , Property Crimes , possession of drugs , Sex Crimes , BUII , DUII , DUI , major traffic crimes and many other crimes in all Oregon counties and cities, including: Multnomah County, Washington County, Clackamas County, Marion County, Polk County, Tillamook County, Wilsonville, Salem, Tigard, Beaverton, Oregon City, St. Paul, Astoria, The Dalles, Rainier, Aurora, Seaside & Hillsboro. We also deal with legal cases in southern Washington State. 2006 JFOLAW.COM All rights reserved Site design by DigiCom WebDesign
|
|
DUI / DWI, Drinking 
