DWI Law for Nunavut

aggressive DUI trial lawyer,

DUI Attorney Riverside DUI Lawyer San Bernardino DUI Law firm Orange County DUI Attorney Los Angeles | Thomas Wallin Law Offices | Have you been accused of a DUI in California? HAVE YOU BEEN ACCUSED OF A DUI IN CALIFORNIA? SPEAK TO A DUI ATTORNEY FOR A FREE DUI CONSULTATION 1-866-857-5900 AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY 7 DAYS A WEEK. The Law Offices of Thomas Wallin can defend you in your Driving Under the Influence (DUI) case in Southern California. As an experienced, aggressive DUI trial lawyer, Mr. Wallin can handle your DUI case whether it is a DUI in Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles or Orange County; you can count on Mr. Wallin. As a DUI criminal defense attorney, Mr. Wallin will represent you at both the DUI criminal proceeding as well as the DUI DMV hearing . In most DUI cases, your DUI lawyer can appear on your behalf in court, saving you time and embarrassment. As a former Riverside County Public Defender attorney, Mr. Wallin is familiar with the DUI courts in Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles and Orange County. A DUI arrest can be the scariest thing you’ve ever experienced. Your life is on the line … your reputation, your job, your family. You need a California DUI attorney who understands your fear, who can help. You need an attorney experienced in DUI you can trust, who will go the distance for you with a focused plan of action and support. Mr. Wallin is a California criminal defense DUI attorney who gets results throughout Southern California. DUI defense attorney Thomas Wallin has defended hundreds of DUI clients throughout Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange County and Los Angeles and has a successful track record to show for it. If you have been charged with a DUI for the first time or a subsequent offense, you need a California DUI attorney of the greatest skill and experience on your side. Mr. Wallin is familiar with the courts and can use alternative sentencing to keep you out of jail, whether it is a first offense or a third DUI offense, DUI attorney Thomas Wallin will guide you through the process . Make sure the DUI attorney you hire personally handles your case and is familiar with DUI courts throughout Southern California whether it’s a DUI attorney in Riverside, DUI in San Bernardino, DUI in Los Angeles or DUI lawyer in Orange County. Unlike other firms, you will not be passed off to a junior DUI attorney with little experience. Your DUI case will be handled personally by Mr. Wallin. He will take your DUI case all the way through a DUI jury trial if necessary and he is willing and able to handle the most challenging DUI cases among the toughest adversaries in Southern California including DUI cases in Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange County and DUI cases in Los Angeles. In most Southern California DUI cases, you may never even have to appear in court, so you won’t miss work or family responsibilities. In addition, Mr. Wallin can refer you to a well-respected bail bondsman who will arrange for your bail professionally and discretely. Mr. Wallin’s DUI law firm handles DUI criminal and DUI DMV matters in the following cities and counties in Southern California: Riverside DUI Attorney, Riverside DUI Lawyer, Riverside DUI Law Firm in Riverside County Mr. Wallin, an experienced California DUI attorney, handles matters throughout Riverside County including but not limited to Aguanga, Anza, Arlington, Calimesa, Casa Blanca, Cherry Valley, Corona, Corona Hills, Edgemont, El Cerrito, Gilman, Glen Avon, Glenn Valley, Hemet, Home Gardens, Homeland, Hot Springs, Idyllwild, La Sierra, Lake View, Mead Valley, Meadow Brook, Mira Loma, Moreno, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Quail Valley, Riverside (where DUI lawyer Thomas Wallin maintains a DUI Law Office ), Rodea, Sage, San Jacinto, Santa Ana Canyon, Soboba, Sun City, Temecula, Temescal Canyon, Vail Lake, Valle Vista, Wildomar Lake, Winchester San Bernardino DUI Attorney, San Bernardino Lawyer, San Bernardino Law Firm in San Bernardino County The DUI law Firm of Thomas Wallin handles DUI matters throughout San Bernardino County including but not limited to Adelanto, Apple Valley, Bloomington, Chino, Chino Hills, Colton, El Mirage, Etiwanda, Forest Falls, Grand Terrace, Hesperia, Highland, Loma Linda, Lucerne Valley, Mentone, Montclair, Ontario, Pinon Hills, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands (where DUI lawyer Thomas Wallin maintains a DUI Law Office ), Rialto, San Bernardino City, Victorville, Wrightwood, Yucaipa Los Angeles DUI Lawyer, Los Angeles DUI Attorney, Los Angeles DUI Law Firm in Los Angeles County One of Southern California’s leaders in DUI defense also handles matters throughout Los Angeles County including but not limited to Agoura Hills, Alhambra, Angeles Vista, Artesia, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Bellflower, Beverly Hills, Burbank, Carson, Cerritos, Chatsworth, Claremont, Commerce, Compton, Covina, Culver City, Downtown LA, Downey, El Monte, El Segundo, Flintridge, Foothill Division, Gardena, Glendale, Glendora, Granada Hills, Hawaiian Gardens, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Hidden Hills, Hollywood, Industry, Inglewood, Irwindale, La Canada, La Crescenta, La Habra Heights, La Mirada, La Puente, La Verne, Lakewood, Lancaster, Lenox, Little Rock, Lomita, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Lynwood, Manhattan Beach, Marina Del Rey, Monterey Park, Montrose, Northridge, Norwalk, Palmdale, Palos Verdes Estates, Paramount, Pearl Blossom, Pico Rivera, Pomona, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Reseda, Rolling Hills Estates, San Fernando, San Gabriel, Santa Clarita, Santa Fe Springs, Santa Monica, Signal Hills, Temple City, Three Points, Torrance, Van Nuys, Ventura County, Verdugo City, Viewpark, Walnut, West Covina, West Hollywood, Westlake Village, Whittier Orange County DUI Attorney, Orange County DUI Lawyer, Orange County DUI Law Firm in Orange County Mr. Wallin also maintains a DUI Law Office in Orange County where he serves as a leading DUI defense attorney and serves the Orange County area including but not limited to DUI cases in Aliso Viejo, Anaheim, Balboa Island, Brea, Buena Park, Capistrano Beach, Corona Del Mar, Costa Mesa, Coto de Caza, Cypress, Dana Point, El Toro, El Toro Marine Base, Foothill Ranch, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine (where DUI Lawyer Thomas Wallin maintains a DUI Law Office ), La Habra, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Lake Forest, Leisure World, Lemon Heights, Los Alamitos, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Orange, OC, Orange Park Acres, Placentia, Rancho San Margarita, Rossmoor, San Clemente, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Silverado Canyon, Stanton, Sunset Beach, Tustin, Villa Park, Westminster, Yorba Linda Mr. Wallin is personally available to assist you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week . Please call for a free first consultation or take a moment to fill out our free case evaluation form on your case. A reasonable fee structure can be determined for your needs. The Law Offices of Thomas Wallin accepts MasterCard, Visa and AMEX. 1-866-857-5900 ©2005 Thomas Wallin Law Offices Designed by Scorpion Design

DWI DUI OWI OUI Driving in Nunavut DUI DWI: International Referral Database of DUI, DWI, Impairedand DrunkDriving, Drinking and Driving, Lawyers & Attorneys State orProvince | County | Region | Attorneys | Courthouses | License & Traffic Offices | Legislation | Instruments | Standards | Experts | Articles Add Attorney | Add Courthouse | AddDMV Office | Add Legislation | AddInstrument | Add Standards Home | Debate | AddingYour Firm | Words are used in Canada? DUI | DWI | DrunkDriving | Drinkingand Driving | DUI Laws | DWILaws | Ontariodui | Ontario dui laws | ImpairedDriving | TorontoDUI | BramptonDUI | MississaugaDUI DUI : Driving Under the Influence; DWI : Driving While Intoxicated;OUI: Operating Under the Inflence; OWI: Operating While Intoxicated; ImpairedDriving: Impaired in Canada to Slightest Degree; Over 80: Excess BAC alcohol inCanada over 80 mg/100mL; Care or Control: Occupy seat normallyoccupied by operator in Canada, act or series of acts involving useof car , fittings or equipment Nunavut DWI DUI OWI OUI Information Summaries of DUI Law DWI Law for Nunavut What to Do On DUI Court DWI Court First Appearance What to Wear to DUI Court DWI COurt Being Early for DUI Court and DWI Court Directory of DUI Courthouses and DWI Courthouses in Nunavut Directory of Motor Vehicle Offices BAC Instruments used in DUI Court and DWI Court Cases DUI and DWI Breath and Blood Collection Standards and Departments Responsible DUI and DWI Legislation in Nunavut Substantive DUI/DWI/Excess Alcohol Offense DUI DWI Refusal Offense/Presumption DUI DWI Administrative Driver's License Suspension Drinking and Driving Procedure/Evidence DUI DWI Penalties Suspension on Conviction, Prohibition DUI DWI Drive While Suspended Offense Immigration, Exclusion of Visitors resulting from DWI DUI Reciprocal DUI DWI Agreements Constitutional Rights in DUI DWI Cases Other Criminal Non-DUI Non-DWI Legislation DUI Attorneys DWI Attorneys - Lists by County in Nunavut List of DUI Attorneys DWI Attorneys and Practice Descriptions Avocats DUI,DWI, droit criminel Adwokaci DUI,DWI, prawo kryminalne List of DUI Forensic Experts, DWI Forensic Experts and Practice Descriptions State/Province DUI DWI Data and Links to DUI DWI Statutes The Impaired Driving Checklist The Drinking Driver's worksheet DUI DWI and Criminal Defense Character Reference Letters Articles and Writings Nunavut DUI Attorney DWI Attorney Articles and Writings Nunavut DUI Lawyer DWI Lawyer Articles and Writings Nunavut Drunk Driving Attorney Articles and Writings Nunavut Drunk Driving Lawyer Articles and Writings AddDL Lawyers and DUI Information in Nunavut Cities and Towns Sponsored by: No records returned. 866 | DUI DWI Practice Descriptions, Links, andProfiles | DUI DWI Summaries of Law | Searchby Region, County, City | First Appearance inDUI Court DWI Court | MembersOnly | AddYour Firm | Delete | Privacy | For Ontario DUIDWI impaired driving criminal law information please visit www.lawyers.ca See also TorontoDUI For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: AllbissLawdata Ltd. , 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga,Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4. Theauthor and the participants make no representation or warranty whatsoeveras to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.Advertisement.Theselawyers do not practice in association. WARNING: All informationcontained herein is provided for the purpose of providing basic information onlyand should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any andall liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are stronglyencouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of theinformation contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from aproperly retained lawyer or attorney.

Miami DUI

Bulletin FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 09-14-2005 CONTACT: Major Michael Mills, South Miami Police Department 6130 SW 72 St., South Miami , FL 33143 305-663-6310 South Miami Police Department Participated in You Drink & Drive. You Lose! Law enforcement worked overtime this Labor Day weekend to crack down on drunk drivers. The You Drink & Drive. You Lose National Crackdown, first launched in December 1999, is a comprehensive impaired-driving prevention effort focused on conducting highly visible law-enforcement-related efforts to deter impaired driving. For more information about the campaign, visit www.StopImpairedDriving.org . South Miami Police Department reminds everyone: Be responsible and don't risk it you will be caught. If you plan to drink, choose a designated driver before going out. Take mass transit, a taxicab, or ask a sober friend to drive you home. Spend the night where the activity is being held. Report impaired drivers to law enforcement. Always buckle up it's your best defense against an impaired driver. South Miami Police Department ran a publicized DUI checkpoint on 09-01-05 from 11:00 P.M. until 4:00 AM . The following agencies participated in these activities: Coral Gables PD, Pinecrest PD, and Sweetwater PD. Six officers from these other agencies were on hand for the checkpoint. This Checkpoint was supported by Miami-Dade County MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving); MADD generously funded a South Miami Police Department Program to create reflective signs for the Checkpoint as required by law. High saturation patrols by South Miami Police Department Officers were also conducted in the areas of US1 (State Road 5) , Sunset Drive (SW 72 Street) and SW 80 th Street, for DUI, red light running, and other traffic violations. -2- South Miami Police Officers also assisted the City of Sweetwater PD in a DUI checkpoint in their city. The results of these combine efforts were as follows: 4 DUI arrests 1 DRE evaluation was performed (driving under the influence of dangerous drugs) 1 arrest was made for driving with a suspended license 16 Promise to Appear Arrests were made 7 seatbelt tickets were issued 3 child restraint tickets were issued 41 speeding tickets were issued 6 uninsured motorist tickets were issued ###

OUIL

Michigan Drunk Driving Defense Lawyer | OUIL DUI DWI OWI MIP Defense Law Attorney | Michigan's new "Bad Driver Tax" Overview Get Help Now! Greater Detroit Area " Greater Detroit Area Greater Detroit Area "Patrick T. Barone Site Navigation Return Home DUI Defenses DUI Sample Cases DUI Attorney Info DUI Resources DUI Courts Info DUI Driver License DUI Links My arrest in this offense took place in Detroit and Mr. Barone was actually recommended by a number of Detroit Police Officers. To me, that says it all. Not only was I impressed & confident in Mr. Barone's ability, but with his colleague Mike Boyle with whom I had a more intimate interaction with. 100% satisfaction. M.K. Michigan's new "Bad Driver Tax" Overview During the same congressional session when Michigan's legislators amended the statutes to bring Michigan's drunk driving laws into compliance with the National .08 "legal limit," the Michigan Legislature also drafted, and the Governor signed into law, a new revenue producing measure. This new measure creates a "driver responsibility fee" that is assessed by Michigan's Secretary of State whenever a driver reaches seven points or more on his or her driving record. Additionally, certain enumerated offenses require the payment of very high fees, and these higher fees are independent of the number of points otherwise assessed. All of these fees are also independent of, and in addition to, any fines or costs or any other money penalties that an individual may be ordered to pay by any court. This new law provides that the Secretary of State "shall send notice of the driver responsibility assessment to the individual informing them of the fee." The fee must then be paid within 30 days of the notice, or a second notice will be sent. If the fee is not paid within 30 days of the second notice, then the driver's driving privileges will be suspended by the Secretary of State. It is also worth noting that this measure indicates that the fee is due whether or not the individual is a licensed driver. The result of this is that even where the individual has lost his or her driving privileges for one or more years, the fees remain due during this non-license period, and must still be paid. What is not clear is whether the suspension imposed for not paying this fee runs concurrent or consecutive to any underlying period of suspension or revocation. OPERATING WHILE INTOXICATED The measure provides that upon learning that an individual has been found guilty of operating while intoxicated (commonly called "drunk driving"), the Secretary of State will assess a $1,000.00 driver responsibility fee for each of the following two consecutive years. The same is true of being found guilty of having an unlawful blood alcohol level (now .08 or greater). Because this fee is imposed by the Secretary of State, and is otherwise separate from the fines and costs that might be imposed by the court, the total costs (not including expenses such as increased insurance payments) of a single drunk driving conviction will be at a minimum $2,000.00 plus a fine of $100.00-$500.00 plus court costs, probation oversight fees, screening fees, community service fees, fees payed to reimburse the costs of prosecution and so on and so forth. OTHER $1000.00 OFFENSES The measure also provides that upon learning that an individual has been found guilty of manslaughter, negligent homicide, drunk driving causing death or serious impairment of a body function, injuring or killing a construction worker while driving in a construction zone, felony driving, or any other felony resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle, the Secretary of State shall assess a $1,000.00 driver responsibility assessment for each of the following two consecutive years. This $1,000.00 fee is also assessed for fleeing and eluding an officer, and for being found guilty of failing to stop and disclose identity at an accident. OPERATING WHILE IMPAIRED This measure provides also that upon learning that an individual has been found guilty of operating while impaired, the Secretary of State will assess a $500.00 driver responsibility fee for each of the following two consecutive years. As with drunk driving, because this fee is imposed by the Secretary of State, and is otherwise separate from the fines and costs that might be imposed by the court, the total costs (not including expenses such as increased insurance payments) of a single impaired driving conviction will be at a minimum $1,000.00 plus a fine of up to $300.00 plus court costs, probation oversight fees, screening fees, community service fees, fees payed to reimburse the costs of prosecution and so on and so forth. OTHER $500.00 OFFENSES These include being found guilty of operating with the presence of any enumerated controlled substance, reckless driving, driving with a suspended license (non-felony), or being a person less than 21 years is operating with the presence any alcohol (zero tolerance). Upon learning that a driver has been found guilty of these offense, the Secretary of State will assess a $500.00 driver responsibility fee for each of the following two consecutive years. DRIVING WITHOUT A LICENSE AND/OR FAILING TO PRODUCE A CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Upon learning that an individual has been found guilty of driving without a license and failure to produce a certificate of insurance, the Secretary of State will assess a $150.00 driver responsibility fee for each of the following two consecutive years. ACCUMULATING SEVEN OR MORE POINTS Any driver who accumulates seven or more points within a 2-year period for any other violation shall be assessed a $150.00 driver assessment fee, with an additional $50.00 for each additional point. The driver will be assessed this fee once per year for each year where the point total is seven or more. EFFECTIVE DATE The new statute takes effect October 1, 2003. Click to download the complete text of the new laws . Return Home

Driving Under Influence

Driving Under the Influence among Adult Drivers July 1, 2005 Driving Under the Influence among Adult Drivers In Brief In 2002 and 2003, almost 16.6 percent of adult drivers aged 21 or older reported that they had driven while under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs during the past year Male drivers aged 21 or older (22.0 percent) were nearly twice as likely as their female counterparts (11.4 percent) to have driven under the influence of alcohol or drugs during the past year More than one in three adult drivers aged 21 to 25 (33.8 percent) reported having driven under the influence of alcohol or drugs during the past year According to a 2001 survey by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, most persons of driving age (62.0 percent) believed that they should not drive after having two or more drinks, and nearly all reported that they perceived drinking and driving to threaten their personal safety. 1 Nonetheless, in 2003, 10.9 percent of drivers/motorcyclists in fatal motor vehicle crashes were under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or medication. 2 The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) asks persons aged 12 or older if they had driven a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs in the past year. 3 The survey also asks about the use of alcohol and any illicit drugs during the past year. NSDUH defines "illicit drugs" to include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), inhalants, hallucinogens, heroin, or prescription-type drugs used nonmedically. This report focuses on past year alcohol and illicit drug use and driving behaviorsof adult drivers aged 21 or older. All findings presented in this report are annual averages based on combined 2002 and 2003 NSDUH data. Alcohol and Illicit Drug Use among Adult Drivers In the Nation as a whole, 93.6 percent of persons aged 21 or older were classified as drivers. 4 Among adult drivers aged 21 or older, 71.0 percent reported using alcohol during the 12 months prior to the survey, and 12.6 percent reported having used an illicit drug during the past year. Figure 1. Percentages of Adult Drivers Aged 21 or Older Who Reported Driving a Vehicle Under the Influence of Alcohol and/or Illicit Drugs During the Past Year: 2002 and 2003 Figure 2. Percentages of Drivers Aged 21 or Older Who Reported Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Illicit Drugs During the Past Year, by Age Group: 2002 and 2003 Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs in the Past Year In 2002 and 2003, 16.6 percent of adult drivers aged 21 or older (an estimated 30.7 million persons) reported that they had driven while under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs during the past year. Among drivers of this age group, 15.7 percent had driven under the influence of alcohol during the past year, 4.3 percent had driven under the influence of illicit drugs, and 3.0 percent had driven under the combined influence of alcohol and drugs during the past year (Figure 1). Demographic Characteristics In 2002 and 2003, male drivers aged 21 or older (22.0 percent) were nearly twice as likely as their female counterparts (11.4 percent) to have driven under the influence of alcohol or drugs during the past year. Younger adult drivers were more likely to have driven under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs than older adult drivers. For example, 33.8 percent of adult drivers aged 21 to 25 reported having driven under the influence during the past year compared with 10.0 percent of drivers aged 50 to 64 and 3.4 percent of drivers aged 65 or older who reported having done so (Figure 2). Among racial/ethnic groups, American Indians/Alaska Natives and non-Hispanic whites (18.8 and 18.1 percent, respectively) were generally more likely to have driven under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs than were members of other racial and ethnic groups (Figure 3). Figure 3. Percentages of Drivers Aged 21 or Older Who Reported Driving a Vehicle Under the Influence of Alcohol or Illicit Drugs During the Past Year, by Race/Ethnicity: 2002 and 2003 Geographic Differences Rates of driving under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs also differed among geographic regions of the country and among counties of different population density. Drivers aged 21 or older living in the Midwest (20.5 percent) were more likely to have driven under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs in the past year than their counterparts living in the West (17.1 percent), Northeast (15.6 percent), or the South (14.3 percent). 5 Adult drivers in this age group residing in non-metropolitan counties (14.2 percent) were less likely to have driven under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs during the past year than those residing in small metropolitan counties (17.2 percent) or large metropolitan counties (17.0 percent). 6 End Notes National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2003, June). National survey of drinking and driving attitudes and behaviors, 2001 (Traffic Tech No. 280, NHTSA Technology Transfer Series). Retrieved April 11, 2005, from http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/alcohol/traffic-tech2003/TT280.pdf National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2005, January). Table 65: Related factors for drivers and motorcycle operators involved in fatal crashes. In Traffic Safety Facts 2003: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System (p. 100, DOT HS 809 775). Washington, DC: Author. [Available in http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-30/ncsa/AvailInf.html ] Respondents were asked, in three different questions, if during the past 12 months they had driven a vehicle while under the influence of (a) alcohol only, (b) illicit drugs only, or (c) a combination of alcohol and illicit drugs used together. Responses to these questions then were recoded to determine the prevalence of driving under the influence (DUI) involving (a) alcohol, (b) illicit drugs, (c) either alcohol or illicit drugs, or (d) both alcohol and illicit drugs. Respondents were identified as drivers if they responded "never," "seldom," "sometimes," or "always" to a question about the frequency of their wearing a seatbelt when they drove. If a respondent indicated that he or she did not drive when asked the question about wearing a seatbelt while driving or did not give a response to that question, he or she was excluded from this analysis. The Midwest has 12 States: IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, and WI. The South has 17 States: AL, AR, DC, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, and WV. The Northeast has 9 States: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, and VT. And the West has 13 States: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, and WY. Large metropolitan areas have a population of 1 million or more. Small metropolitan areas have a population of fewer than 1 million. Non-metropolitan areas are outside metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs), as defined by the Office of Management and Budget. See the U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003, June 12). About metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas . Retrieved May 26, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/aboutmetro.html Figure Note Source: SAMHSA, 2002 and 2003 NSDUH. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) is an annual survey sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Prior to 2002, this survey was called the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA). The 2002 and 2003 data used in this report are based on information obtained from 71,648 persons aged 21 or older. The survey collects data by administering questionnaires to a representative sample of the population through face-to-face interviews at their place of residence. The NSDUH Report is prepared by the Office of Applied Studies (OAS), SAMHSA, and by RTI International in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. (RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.) Information and data for this issue are based on the following publications and statistics: Office of Applied Studies. (2004). Results from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (DHHS Publication No. SMA 04-3964, NSDUH Series H-25). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies. (2003). Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (DHHS Publication No. SMA 03-3836, NSDUH Series H-22). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Also available online: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov . Because of improvements and modifications to the 2002 NSDUH, estimates from the 2002 and 2003 surveys should not be compared with estimates from the 2001 or earlier versions of the survey to examine changes over time. The NSDUH Report (formerly The NHSDA Report ) is published periodically by the Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration ( SAMHSA ). All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA . Additional copies of this report or other reports from the Office of Applied Studies are available on-line: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov . Citation of the source is appreciated. For questions about this report please e-mail: shortreports@samhsa.hhs.gov . Click to Return to OAS Home Page Click to Email OAS Data Questions Click For Non-frames / text version of site This page was last updated on June 23, 2005 . SAMHSA, an agency in the Department of Health and Human Services, is the Federal Government's lead agency for improving the quality and availability of substance abuse prevention, addiction treatment, and mental health services in the United States. Privacy Statement | Site Disclaimer | Accessibility What's New Highlights Topics Data Drugs Pubs Short Reports Treatment Help Mail OAS