Drunk Driving Defense

Arizona DUI Law

Brampton dui DUI D.U.I. Brampton dui DUI D.U.I.: driving under the influence in Brampton, Canada The words dui laws, DUI law, D.U.I, and "driving under the influence", are usedby DUI lawyers and DUI attorneys in United States DUI Law . The expression "DUI" is not found in the CriminalCode of Canada. Canadians use terminology other than DUI or "driving underthe influence". In Brampton, Ontario we use the words "impaired driving" or"impaired operation", or "impaired care or control" but not "driving under the influence"or "driving under impairment". In Brampton, Canada it is any impairment byalcohol or a drug of one's ability to operate a motor vehicle combined withoperation that is forbidden, not "driving under impairment" or"driving under the influence" (DUI). It is also a "DUI"criminal offence in Canada to drive having more than 80 milligrams of alcoholper 100 mls of blood whether one's ability to drive is"influenced" (DUI) or not . Canada has two main substantive DUI law criminal offences: impaired operation or careor control , over 80 operation or careor control Section 253. Every one commits an offence who operates a motorvehicle or vessel or operates or assists in the operation of an aircraft orof railway equipment or has the careor control of a motor vehicle, vessel, aircraft or railway equipment,whether it is in motion or not, (a) while the person's ability to operate the vehicle, vessel, aircraft or railway equipment is impaired by alcohol or a drug; or (b) having consumed alcohol in such a quantity that the concentration in theperson's blood exceeds eighty milligrams of alcohol in one hundred millilitresof blood. Impaired operation or care or control in Brampton, Canada includes operation or care orcontrol of a motor vehicle, vessel, or aircraft while one's ability to operateis impaired by alcohol or a drug to any degree of impairment. This DUI offence isproven by evidence of bad driving and various indicia of impairment observedsuch as slurred speech, difficulty with standing walking turning, red glassyglossy bloodshot eyes, dilated pupils, odor odour of an alcoholic beverage,complexion flushed face, and performance on physical tests. The DUI offence of excess blood alcohol or over 80 is usually proven by breathtests that determine blood alcohol concentration using and approved instrumentsuch as a Breathalyzer 900 900A or Intoxilyzer 5000C. Blood tests are used inDUI cases where breath testsare not practical to provide evidence of blood alcohol concentration. Both Canadian DUI offences are federal criminal law offences. The Crown in Brampton, Canada can prosecute a DUI in either of two ways. DUI offences are hybridoffences in Canada. The Crown may prosecute a DUI offence by indictment (roughlysimilar to a US felony DUI) or they may prosecute a DUI offence by summaryconviction (roughly similar to a US misdemeanor). The local Brampton Crown Attorney mustelect whether to proceed with the D.U.I. by indictment or by summary conviction.Until he or she elects, the DUI offence is deemed to be prosecuted byindictment. Most Canadian DUI offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The usual penalty for a first DUI offence in Canada is a fine. The minimumsecond DUI offence penalty is 14 days in jail. The minimum penalty for a thirdDUI is 90 days in jail. There is always a DUI driving prohibition and the local province will suspend a DUI offender's driver's licence . If a US citizen or other non-Canadian citizen is convicted of a DUI offencein the USA or a dui offence in any country other than Canada, the DUI offenderwill be inadmissibleto Canada on grounds of criminality, unless rehabilitated , because the DUIoffence is deemed to be a Canadian DUI offence and all Canadian DUI offences aredeemed indictable (similar to a US felony - see above) unless the Crown haselected to proceed with the DUI offence by summary conviction (which will neverhave happened because the DUI offense occurred outside Canada. The situationwill be different if the DUI offence occurs in Canada and the Crown elects toproceed by summary conviction which they normally do. Click the banner for more Brampton and Canadian DUI law information. DUI, D.U.I., or driving under the influence is, however,an important concept used in the United States. For more detailed DUI legalinformation click on one of the links below: Alabama DUI DUI in Alabama D.U.I. in Alabama Alabama D.U.I. Alabama dui DUI AL D.U.I. AL Alaska DUI DUI in Alaska D.U.I. in Alaska Alaska D.U.I. Alaska dui DUI AK D.U.I. AK Alberta DUI DUI in Alberta D.U.I. in Alberta Alberta D.U.I. Alberta dui DUI AB D.U.I. AB Arizona DUI DUI in Arizona D.U.I. in Arizona Arizona D.U.I. Arizona dui DUI AZ D.U.I. AZ Arkansas DUI DUI in Arkansas D.U.I. in Arkansas Arkansas D.U.I. Arkansas dui DUI AR D.U.I. AR British Columbia DUI DUI in British Columbia D.U.I. in British Columbia British Columbia D.U.I. British Columbia dui DUI BC D.U.I. BC California DUI DUI in California D.U.I. in California California D.U.I. California dui DUI CA D.U.I. CA Colorado DUI DUI in Colorado D.U.I. in Colorado Colorado D.U.I. Colorado dui DUI CO D.U.I. CO Connecticut DUI DUI in Connecticut D.U.I. in Connecticut Connecticut D.U.I. Connecticut dui DUI CT D.U.I. CT Delaware DUI DUI in Delaware D.U.I. in Delaware Delaware D.U.I. Delaware dui DUI DE D.U.I. DE District of Columbia DUI DUI in District of Columbia D.U.I. in District of Columbia District of Columbia D.U.I. District of Columbia dui DUI DC D.U.I. DC England DUI DUI in England D.U.I. in England England D.U.I. England dui DUI EN D.U.I. EN Florida DUI DUI in Florida D.U.I. in Florida Florida D.U.I. Florida dui DUI FL D.U.I. FL Georgia DUI DUI in Georgia D.U.I. in Georgia Georgia D.U.I. Georgia dui DUI GA D.U.I. GA Hawaii DUI DUI in Hawaii D.U.I. in Hawaii Hawaii D.U.I. Hawaii dui DUI HI D.U.I. HI Idaho DUI DUI in Idaho D.U.I. in Idaho Idaho D.U.I. Idaho dui DUI ID D.U.I. ID Illinois DUI DUI in Illinois D.U.I. in Illinois Illinois D.U.I. Illinois dui DUI IL D.U.I. IL Indiana DUI DUI in Indiana D.U.I. in Indiana Indiana D.U.I. Indiana dui DUI IN D.U.I. IN Iowa DUI DUI in Iowa D.U.I. in Iowa Iowa D.U.I. Iowa dui DUI IA D.U.I. IA Kansas DUI DUI in Kansas D.U.I. in Kansas Kansas D.U.I. Kansas dui DUI KS D.U.I. KS Kentucky DUI DUI in Kentucky D.U.I. in Kentucky Kentucky D.U.I. Kentucky dui DUI KY D.U.I. KY Louisiana DUI DUI in Louisiana D.U.I. in Louisiana Louisiana D.U.I. Louisiana dui DUI LA D.U.I. LA Maine DUI DUI in Maine D.U.I. in Maine Maine D.U.I. Maine dui DUI ME D.U.I. ME Manitoba DUI DUI in Manitoba D.U.I. in Manitoba Manitoba D.U.I. Manitoba dui DUI MB D.U.I. MB Maryland DUI DUI in Maryland D.U.I. in Maryland Maryland D.U.I. Maryland dui DUI MD D.U.I. MD Massachusetts DUI DUI in Massachusetts D.U.I. in Massachusetts Massachusetts D.U.I. Massachusetts dui DUI MA D.U.I. MA Michigan DUI DUI in Michigan D.U.I. in Michigan Michigan D.U.I. Michigan dui DUI MI D.U.I. MI Minnesota DUI DUI in Minnesota D.U.I. in Minnesota Minnesota D.U.I. Minnesota dui DUI MN D.U.I. MN Mississippi DUI DUI in Mississippi D.U.I. in Mississippi Mississippi D.U.I. Mississippi dui DUI MS D.U.I. MS Missouri DUI DUI in Missouri D.U.I. in Missouri Missouri D.U.I. Missouri dui DUI MO D.U.I. MO Montana DUI DUI in Montana D.U.I. in Montana Montana D.U.I. Montana dui DUI MT D.U.I. MT Nebraska DUI DUI in Nebraska D.U.I. in Nebraska Nebraska D.U.I. Nebraska dui DUI NE D.U.I. NE Nevada DUI DUI in Nevada D.U.I. in Nevada Nevada D.U.I. Nevada dui DUI NV D.U.I. NV New Brunswick DUI DUI in New Brunswick D.U.I. in New Brunswick New Brunswick D.U.I. New Brunswick dui DUI NB D.U.I. NB New Hampshire DUI DUI in New Hampshire D.U.I. in New Hampshire New Hampshire D.U.I. New Hampshire dui DUI NH D.U.I. NH New Jersey DUI DUI in New Jersey D.U.I. in New Jersey New Jersey D.U.I. New Jersey dui DUI NJ D.U.I. NJ New Mexico DUI DUI in New Mexico D.U.I. in New Mexico New Mexico D.U.I. New Mexico dui DUI NM D.U.I. NM New York DUI DUI in New York D.U.I. in New York New York D.U.I. New York dui DUI NY D.U.I. NY Newfoundland DUI DUI in Newfoundland D.U.I. in Newfoundland Newfoundland D.U.I. Newfoundland dui DUI NF D.U.I. NF North Carolina DUI DUI in North Carolina D.U.I. in North Carolina North Carolina D.U.I. North Carolina dui DUI NC D.U.I. NC North Dakota DUI DUI in North Dakota D.U.I. in North Dakota North Dakota D.U.I. North Dakota dui DUI ND D.U.I. ND Northwest Territories DUI DUI in Northwest Territories D.U.I. in Northwest Territories Northwest Territories D.U.I. Northwest Territories dui DUI NT D.U.I. NT Nova Scotia DUI DUI in Nova Scotia D.U.I. in Nova Scotia Nova Scotia D.U.I. Nova Scotia dui DUI NS D.U.I. NS Nunavut DUI DUI in Nunavut D.U.I. in Nunavut Nunavut D.U.I. Nunavut dui DUI NU D.U.I. NU Ohio DUI DUI in Ohio D.U.I. in Ohio Ohio D.U.I. Ohio dui DUI OH D.U.I. OH Oklahoma DUI DUI in Oklahoma D.U.I. in Oklahoma Oklahoma D.U.I. Oklahoma dui DUI OK D.U.I. OK Ontario DUI DUI in Ontario D.U.I. in Ontario Ontario D.U.I. Ontario dui DUI ON D.U.I. ON Oregon DUI DUI in Oregon D.U.I. in Oregon Oregon D.U.I. Oregon dui DUI OR D.U.I. OR Pennsylvania DUI DUI in Pennsylvania D.U.I. in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania D.U.I. Pennsylvania dui DUI PA D.U.I. PA Prince Edward Island DUI DUI in Prince Edward Island D.U.I. in Prince Edward Island Prince Edward Island D.U.I. Prince Edward Island dui DUI PE D.U.I. PE Quebec DUI DUI in Quebec D.U.I. in Quebec Quebec D.U.I. Quebec dui DUI QC D.U.I. QC Rhode Island DUI DUI in Rhode Island D.U.I. in Rhode Island Rhode Island D.U.I. Rhode Island dui DUI RI D.U.I. RI Saskatchewan DUI DUI in Saskatchewan D.U.I. in Saskatchewan Saskatchewan D.U.I. Saskatchewan dui DUI SK D.U.I. SK South Carolina DUI DUI in South Carolina D.U.I. in South Carolina South Carolina D.U.I. South Carolina dui DUI SC D.U.I. SC South Dakota DUI DUI in South Dakota D.U.I. in South Dakota South Dakota D.U.I. South Dakota dui DUI SD D.U.I. SD Tennessee DUI DUI in Tennessee D.U.I. in Tennessee Tennessee D.U.I. Tennessee dui DUI TN D.U.I. TN Texas DUI DUI in Texas D.U.I. in Texas Texas D.U.I. Texas dui DUI TX D.U.I. TX Utah DUI DUI in Utah D.U.I. in Utah Utah D.U.I. Utah dui DUI UT D.U.I. UT Vermont DUI DUI in Vermont D.U.I. in Vermont Vermont D.U.I. Vermont dui DUI VT D.U.I. VT Virginia DUI DUI in Virginia D.U.I. in Virginia Virginia D.U.I. Virginia dui DUI VA D.U.I. VA Washington State DUI DUI in Washington State D.U.I. in Washington State Washington State D.U.I. Washington State dui DUI WA D.U.I. WA West Virginia DUI DUI in West Virginia D.U.I. in West Virginia West Virginia D.U.I. West Virginia dui DUI WV D.U.I. WV Wisconsin DUI DUI in Wisconsin D.U.I. in Wisconsin Wisconsin D.U.I. Wisconsin dui DUI WI D.U.I. WI Wyoming DUI DUI in Wyoming D.U.I. in Wyoming Wyoming D.U.I. Wyoming dui DUI WY D.U.I. WY Yukon DUI DUI in Yukon D.U.I. in Yukon Yukon D.U.I. Yukon dui DUI YT D.U.I. YT

NJ-DWI - NJ Drunk Driving Defense Information Contact Peter H. Lederman, Esq. Law offices of Lomurro, Davison, Eastman and Munoz Driving While Intoxicated.. DWI is a serious offense in New Jersey. The Court must impose mandatory license suspensions, fines, surcharges and in certain cases, jail. The Division of Motor Vehicles must also impose a mandatory insurance surcharge from $3,000 to $3,500. A permanent record of the DWI conviction is also entered on the Drivers Abstract maintained by the New Jersey Division of Motor Vehicles. Penalties differ depending upon whether the offense is a first, second or subsequent offense. We defend DWI charges every day in Courts throughout the State of New Jersey . Our philosophy is that you can not win a DWI case unless you try to win. For this reason, we try almost all of our cases to a verdict unless a better result can be achieved without trial. We make the State prove its case both in trial and in pre-trial suppression motions. We search for all possible evidence which might make the difference in winning a case. We vigorously cross-examine police officers regarding field sobriety tests and observations claimed to suggest intoxication. We work regularly with the top DWI expert in the State of New Jersey, who can attack breath test results and field sobriety test results when these tests have not been correctly administered. My practice is limited to defending drivers charged with Driving While Intoxicated and related offenses. I have been defending drivers charged with DWI over the past 26 years. Over that time, I have had the opportunity of acting as a Municipal Prosecutor, Chairman of the New Jersey State Bar Association Municipal Court Section, testifying before the legislature on issues involving DWI, and instructing other attorneys in how to defend defendants charged with Driving While Intoxicated, on behalf of the New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education " NJICLE" . I have also had articles published in the New Jersey Lawyer on Standardized Field Sobriety Tests, which are the tests administered on the road to determine whether a suspect should be arrested for a breath test. We consider each case to be important. We recognize the severity of mandatory fines, suspensions and surcharges. We vigorously and aggressively defend every case accordingly. If you feel that we can be of assistance, call to discuss your case or contact us to make an appointment . There is no charge for the initial consultation. We can discuss the defenses which might be raised and the fees involved. Our office is centrally located in New Jersey and accessable to all major highways. You should give careful consideration to the selection of an attorney, as proper representation can make a substantial difference in the outcome of your case. We hope we can be of service to you. Peter H. Lederman Home | Proposed DWI/ DUI Reforms | DWI News Field Sobriety Testing - Facts and Fiction | Feedback | Search NJ DWI NJ-DWI Table of Contents | Contact our Law offices Lomurro, Davison, Eastman & Munoz Visit the New Jersey DWI Defense Pages! All contents Peter H. Lederman, PA , NJ-DWI.COM Dark Horse Design Promoted by Submit Away Website Promotions Best viewed with

Blood Alcohol Level

?
sr@=?0?

)MHXoEx]kTu?;/V`
"@!vd@p#IAxe^!YvlW%UrJDY!""~K?aV#!,(;*;Y er{{Tis??!F[B t?M^s{!?SZEpOZa?^V[T;p A[m?v^#^/g'bv)5%?Vq ?wvb^`/$D&\-;}~Kvm=]HRKmm#alMn"Kb*,x+}hVX?n&ZN4r't-/|:}:s&m@yYöq|c1{jC.Lsm_Tst?YY!|-2]3P i~?F Qju21# Eo?qUbG-u].T7/IWh_s ~G~~VV??u_# :=1Mq3q:{?\q72*nvgq7rsWYkStPI+7/X4Q@{7_nd8k:|F?Xo2p:eW 'G' ?VI]~==$f&Uy?[6@p& ?b+Y/&&cx6?*,W}qDi
F[dM^???i %{+)e76@gXh-M+dk!?s@F
:B1me3{::s
\o3gwbzv9C?3#g,wvt3z~{vQBB?K1?Ty?t]o+9rP\LH\
n/h%+9rPB1atGzCU WrG*W0rr
+|ra5Pr?/7B`y@pFL! W@N{;rt`\:WX$XOu^Sbq}Ayx 1mt`c%77|`CgW{s8r[/7GZ9zYn82j?{FA#Yn8]@_C |¸m|,__W|6;llsiG2_nF$Prr#\7};_pr3#W,7zwniO\z¸?D0W?,?e~iGy^AOqfa1?Vy3?[}#~H~

~/l|_:h*"nlqc%ocmCgW26t6~o[p?/7vz2ow?k(z(_06}|2ow??QWdS$KQ/Bj8sNS;?nL5?6t/oESiw{A+?6tF35"icXt=cOJ?=lC_yzELrR1Z;?"ni,.}EOr?d\/'$?H|E1qVTP/"a'?n t/}dN'Cmn/h%kCCm|anhmhHsmtpN:iCgG4w~6?[wTyNs'|g&wF;s\o;9Yl?zGS_A?GY$/Oz6R{\:'?=]LU}P!8kp(^J8Pp?G
p(6t#PCm|.?CO?}??9eC;_04}MPr#?M!G;s8Own'z90GtN*#cg?cR?~?K?{4]=|zsO_?W§t)?Vhat??d:Om(}|l?Oa?j(|l?OMe
i_n5}|2?}]?9]:8?IOW_$??:,?L99-
?6~iC0QHl+
?6t6~%99?U#Q_?{Îl?+wr#YKw`?Zv?BzwF\7\&I?s?|?u\p}Fq,]{?yB;l{f\&~O
ur~O!l?|Gcr#\:|Q;l[f\&~Kur~K"l[#:.xy&_pXU,?Oh}COp?a9Wqr bm^#hGYf#!oJ?z&~"z"bS;gZ}8::?q=?~o8?qYGk #U|9I#Mmu}! t??#x?q:6?Q;[Ze);u(-KaK~bgq\}D4?)wbof?L;??%x$LCPOm?K/)w3_8?2b?;rql%?uqyq%Q;anGvBO5
(

\

,robin.room@sorad.su.se:mailto:robin.room@sorad.su.se#y90


Document Word.Document.80$Microsoft Document`
/0
DArialngs0tt*0DWingdings?0tt*0@.@n?" dd@


@@``@
8
L+

,"$?0?

)M
0

A


A

@
w
?;?;

g
4KdKd*0
ppp
@ F10.0 Acute intoxication due to use of alcoholA. The general criteria for acute intoxication (F1x.0) must be met.G1. There must be clear evidence of recent use of a psychoactive substance (or substances) at sufficiently high dose levels to be consistent with intoxication.G2. There must be symptoms or signs of intoxication compatible with the known actions of the particular substance (or substances), as specified below, and of sufficient severity to produce disturbances in the level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect, or behaviour that are of clinical importance. G3. The symptoms or signs present cannot be accounted for by a medical disorder unrelated to substance use, and not better accounted for by another mental or behavioural disorder B. There must be dysfunctional behaviour, as evidenced by at least one of the following:& C. At least one of the following signs must be present:& & :
P.

4
='



+

n
)The other ICD-10 code for intoxication -2**$

B. There must be dysfunctional behaviour, as evidenced by at least one of the following:1) disinhibition;2) argumentativeness;3) aggression;4) lability of mood;5) impaired attention;6) impaired judgment;7) interference with personal functioning.C. At least one of the following signs must be present: 1) unsteady gait;2) difficulty in standing;3) slurred speech;4) nystagmus;5) decreased level of consciousness (e.g. stupor, coma);6) flushed face;7) conjunctival injection0
P

P
P
b

5

-



R


(Clinical assessment & BAC (Y91 vs. Y90)))$
Factors which might affect the relationship:Extent of assessor s experienceOpportunity to observe or test behaviourProximity in time of BAC and assessmentExtent of subject s tolerance of alcoholVariations in drunken comportmentCulturally-influenced assumptions about social location and on recording of intoxication &-

-
l


+Clinical assessment and BAC: prior studies,,(
Jetter, 1938: 13% of those admitted with  acute alcoholism had zero BACHonkanen, 1977: 14% with  no intoxication had positive BAC,12%  heavily intoxicated had zero BACSimilar result in second Finnish studyTeplin & Lutz 1985: Alcohol Symptom Checklist: 0.85 correlation with BACUS  field sobriety tests for law enforcement:mostly positive, even distinguishing .08% separately from .10%Some more pessimistic reportsTypically test movement and coordination  can such tests be used in a busy ER?TZ{
x
Z{x6

C





@Y90 & Y91 in the WHO Collaborative Study on Alcohol and InjuriesAA$
Comparing:BAC measurement (breathalyzer)Clinical assessment by physician or nurseIncluded recording of clinical signs of intoxicationAssessment by interviewer (4 sites)Equivalencies assigned for comparison:No intoxication d" 0.59 per milleMild intoxication0.60  0.99 per milleModerate intoxication1.00  1.99 per milleSevere/Very severe intoxication 2.00 and moreTau-B correlation 0.68Better agreement on none vs. some than at higher levelsPI
P5P$
P'P
PP8
PI5$'8}


L

Conclusions and options

There is an association between assessment and BAC, but only medium strong at any site.Y91 is not a satisfactory substitute for Y90BAC worth routinely measuring (though not always causal)Summary codes vs. full BAC?Recategorize?Developing clinical instrument to estimate BAC?(rather than intoxication)Or separate Y91, use it as a measure of ostensive drunkenness?Relation of F10.0 to Y90, Y91? Field-testing of F10.0?Y90 for BAC, Y91 for impaired coordination, F10.0 for disinhibition?tP*
P0P
PP*0,





0` 33` Sf3f` 33g` f` www3PP` ZXdbmo` \?3y`?` 3f3ff
` 3f3FKf` hk]wwwf?` ff\`Y{ff` R&- {p_/` 3333
?" d
d@,|?
" dd@


" @ ` n?" dd@


@@``PR







@

`

`
p

$(
6
8










`}
*T Click to edit Master title style!!

0










`

RClick to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird levelFourth levelFifth level!
S
0
5








^
`
X*


0

x}`U? @$f&D!9H&r0*šUl/ZWwu-sgbys9^w^{z?7||8M`&`-^pmmZt8Z]fUHjF+"o^!ru/o kD&P
/Balp :811##& &"&Q S3TdB"A2D91QB?
11Q+"A{1^/@|q!bb)b++#.A\q9ekW"B}[i?^_maE1sRe A50? Fv?EA?"g`GUi0Ia9}T/Rn:G(
V
?#'?0=#u,Mld?-IhMEsZ?~$sKO5WDGYpfU9F1LH?lEw1qu !p)TU}d-?:hh|J4Z?|`H#=|zEi^)NWt.g xZ^Mct757c.7M_??vtwSWv`{[cGIv&+oUcGS0I6mlc6mNIwrYC#'^cTlO; 5xS?4O@/jv5`2V56BP9-mmo)qhEy6kav_{)7VBz?mlc6mlc3{+^| e
F{k?-q?xÃSKhNDl^§1n?
g^W.fp\n5#Nv+Wf*@F|d:|/_Uq j$=Kr=;z#?pR^g`&r{^,}o"FZ^m+,ys5u,%?im:@~~&Q}hDfD@r6UrhSnygk+ |Bs3OÄya^RTT-3S?jH*?K
.$6}=:42\Z54MVVS+YD?by7Li[H\+(dYQ$@KUhZZ?44JV31?Yty1DaKA_l\XQ?RJvq)1ker2C|}-b?ikJ+)=d*?uKym?VVfDfip~E0??ga*E?$;yQAtL][½7-ZL*?(@-M]z]kK}g]G^ol?pPXK,?2T\TCmt$?`+tdf:3ofYhWY
E?&N]] 5? 'sa7(Gw"2$g"(#h2ifW]ix?7,?72FK?\BE"V VKIOF^uv,??Qh@#BVT[Q;[7 nA?w'9A k-?y?hGgxm}]&{A=61o?,dj?72F.3w=IJ6g0e;6Z0ng{?3~G
$?#{_Vs;_6g?ap;t06w*^3"nnXy9PsA\U8xm:C\P3QhZ8n-tv=I?_-_40C?Ppik?o?vbl?6h@la%XxpI*stS9Pu?.y#~*Ioc*l9ÅTx?|0AhKj[;je(Yiw1Y0Iv*\ 7xHT,7P?zcVks}d'0lY-3'A$_N}\8ua2?F&+{:)CQhICPTxulg[XaSY?Dg?J³mg[X+2&?$ ; C
of=;R?KDb?C{^$q?]p9zoY$&.JUe?0]0?v)_u w

_
#o0oAd!cS%RDb.B?A#?wDlE?q~c}ggmKv9xqB;.,'?Bd#"!txD
qb6b9Br/#V7Gzo?!:MzW#yeN5R-zD_w{o25)E}?-^6M'
c]{o6#2
Pj(E- L2oW@\n^??,!OII%
Ig7iMgvP}yN;i3&?Z;xG)`4{3%}fs*4x9nt9.p97h9nd9.`?^UIh7u |~uc}A?IrV?uNFi1P`.dSmAu?vQk?l0Y#?ewm+~kasVxUEpZ?up?K`?5hxrU?zc7#--peuV{{{@?}vaQ^F%?kC?@?W`_COPpooZgF[L{6^. |wE ??E?09crK???;v3Z?g?63mlc?C)eW
Jut3_6Z.?Bw?J~J{%?=B]`3`H
fo8t?gr" 9ee:y^{8???~TDuX0j?t*"{!qpB
%'ZbI F?&r;1?4zRgOb;MO}zJ?inpV 7EK~eh?{I|33IEfw/5hbSnizk _?a
^.?Vhbzze!wJžY1T?e"Toyz@Qj|_TXq6_Dcf#U1$ôh?BaB_/mmu;s-?NN}/mMK^/u].n&jv!746#~HKp@?'?3?/ _a}SOodz9$^]qT|_1Yw~3OF/A
02k?zt=ahhmHcch@3"O4JIy|:!=y?
W,T??v4,~,?V5v4#mlc6mlc4do~m{'5d=|{5^@?[N/?Tsr)K{/E?"&*i1o{j_[iG2tOi_kdjhmrZ,'S"?q? Svjx~^a|qn%$A'56mlc6mlc~?Ý2q X{?O:Gu\sxCbf^?bE]/?OcxS5~56\(xks}? ;14?\'uT~?*;f#{B8"/=yWm\3W_?e/kd~R?vsj$=Kr= 2WX,gs0_{l!??=?|JfJ;a'4i (Za)%QZR?2N9Ka!C}q1kK4jY2?%?qcgP++C3KCt]4YJb4(?}?vTSW&p`V:?"J33+6BzkKS^RY!T8V:+@ s"PEb!u$*hty::2Lh{Uyjw qbGiM3%_K??z)ox
"?Nf
/D"1E'b8q}^O|~w]}3q5]F4Qz{/@Gq[gCgdsq8V{q2qEla Is$dv:d/b6?H&y1B'{
X%|?WIp8tLR"Iw*gIKq?_ni?N}??hNP;!\Hn/?5cVnIV3( vnW/ La3w?|N|gv?=iMr ?M"n6ZLd!e=WNSQ~fG?Ÿ1_V$RDb.[Jz72gc1ndHfV$5zDBtmKO5`]$V7|7D;O:nkAmt~ !wE{#t.c""GC??1)g/O_3~zssW/ "S=DlE?qah'9A k-y?hGgxmGOrwLzzC{lpI/6Z~Jrv}?Ÿ1s'cxK/b^~Tmshm`_
S+PAjY7& &|51y/?D?-?`v`(n?w?a?Fv^=?rZksBt RMe?!/BcC#z?hLRO,w@e$O{nP8d$oE0D32 C5@@'|F~.I%Va?lhTN:T]6`=K?J[Dx]BqWD*]f`^Q] robemtet2RxnXX,$.B COrNll.0AJlM%}+laAeJPZI?)+C_$d{@VeXBay? 2hd³mg[X+2&?$G@9 ?0]0?v)_?r`XO=d# 6Bc{9v9Nr9n9~Sj9f9Nb9qmhZ?F~#XO'tL1BF]aGI]lI?$X 4oU\rNwCGG[?n?1h4bs??)P\+D@`i9"yHR~?@G-2$H2;'}Jr^?ds_M_qf1A x,{kX[aXK?+ {:vaQ^N'kC?@?W`_COPpoow?'.l]xj[mBzod=?0?N=?0"=b?-AXNb5_@Ml-?j\CC{;.Ku8onIGU?
-"?Zj[!HF.EU4D,nY]lG+[T:q*A;K&`õsse5,?gAY0!Ars+*7&6za?2?$'?d$k/caq??+?|i?*k8 k4YZ"$t4.V3TEcU,D??9hHf0,b9X"?cQ??v{??E*^Uc].BM=7)"u&CLp_k?kg.Yepa'0}06EU6P16`=uh_M}c0c%[G?/IT;vg(ghmPLIrNO4mlca{c
ZPRE~^Ksh-H7l?(tW?Y,OX61`O7zjO*](a0?a`H#jV6ZQX'lM).Rp0_C{j5A9{MbuhB4?x\x
o^Ag3\(hwc~.db3jEy2ce)t/`-48='?Ofan#xodXnd6KR$J\P(beYrFJL;*1K|^wIgSa(*LbNLYMC-k"Bw**8T(?
tk/wtaG_JCe%bo,F(pR"Eg?OgO?TwQM!*LydkVJ|A:6?#\y+Rs9bb '^ItAKn;G?:F{[??[xt7^wV)e'E^tZM?NN3wa&'AsKn2Gp2Vs['st##sFjy$?ToXk'U*:2'UyX?lWu Q=O%o]^78uBJanPHz aIY/z?'e1yb}z?fx*YSH.4ETS/z x^"dr9?.??.w6?r$]Tm|;UNe*PH.?˜U]Gzm|T/S4tRH5.K7t]lH3Ÿde3õT:;\3KaYb%Yo5B[v9'?z%r_QeY&OL?1gBlRJ/.???dt|?NnzHGz!mfxQhzGz!mfS}Toikkl)=aTz?VO z?T=Zz=PT+SIBrMSZijrT+S|4MMjejR&d_y|FMnh^?3x9'3Oo!L#OhQBZ]7ZIK qxKNmSfLvJ~;STr\.9!u8U^ Bwx;4y7nk\XwxSio*MMOZJ:K7MMjejR{V!57MMjejR{h2OWn[*YK\bOW?xf{T:;g?#T:;Jg'Ys"5`M"_z#^7R/A+= r}n@47&\{#5=? rwaFr(riK,IQYjp2VKH?KjkiK,bQYjp+b4?H¾x ÌbLqGt?Q]=e[k7Fg2,]a2*r=jrÂXAQXk%eXJ[,oy?\2#2%Ue+*C#/"?Czeo+;q[:obyi^|~g/R77|~'kh?-%XrH
5?"BNDzFHJL*OVQSUK[Y


w

Oh+'0
`h
$
@
L
p
|



The relation between Blood Alcohol Content and clinically assessed intoxication: lessons from applying the ICD-10 Y90 and Y91 codes in the emergency roomGretchen ThomasCheryl Cherpitel2Microsoft Office PowerPoint@@/@L21
@`}0
G$g
[
y33-
-

$xx-
-
'

@Arial-
.


H2+The relation between Blood Alcohol Content r


.

"System04-


@Arial-
.


@2&and clinically assessed intoxication: 

.
-


@Arial-
.


32lessons from applying the ICD .
-


@Arial-
.


2l
-.
-


@Arial-
.


2n10 Y90 and 
.
-


@Arial-
.


62(Y91 codes in the emergency room
.
-


@Arial-
.


28BRobin Room

.
-


@Arial-
.


N2?/Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs










.
-


@Arial-
.


%2G8Stockholm University





.
-


@Arial-
.


!2O9Stockholm, Swedeni


.
-


@Arial-
.


(2V3robin.room@sorad.su.se



.
-


-
V3Vm-


@Arial-
.


[2f8Presented at an International Conference on Alcohol and 













.
-


@Arial-
.


62lInjury, Berkeley, California, 3











.
-


@Arial-
.


2l^
-.
-


@Arial-
.


2l`6 October, 2005


.
-


.+,D?.+, ?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY[\]^_`acdefghiklmnopqtRoot Entry
dO)Pictures
Current User

jSummaryInformation(
ZPowerPoint Document(
DocumentSummaryInformation8
b

DWI Attorneys Search by

Fairfield, Connecticut DUI/DWI Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms DUI/DWI Lawyers in Fairfield County, Connecticut View all DUI/DWI Lawyers in Connecticut Search for Premier DUI/DWI Attorneys Search by State: AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DC DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MH MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA PR RI SC SD TN TX VI UT VT VA WA WV WI WY -------- or --------- Search within: 25 Miles 50 Miles 125 Miles All From Zip Code: Additional Resources How a criminal lawyer can help DUI/DWI Law (Drunk Driving) FAQs State-by-state DMV Information State laws on Drunk Driving MADD Impaired Driving Facts Alcoholics Anonymous Drunk Driving State Statisics Home -> DUI/DWI -> Connecticut -> Fairfield County Lawyers View All Fairfield County Lawyers Levy & Droney, P.C. Contact: Kenneth J. Levine Free Initial Consultation Send Email | Visit WebSite | Click Here for Phone Number Levy and Droney is a 35 attorney law firm located in Farmington, Connecticut (10 miles outside of Hartford) with an extensive litigation practice which represents clients throughout the state of Connecticut on a variety of litigation matters. Listings for Fairfield County DUI/DWI Lawyers: Bethel, CT Dennis P. McDonough,L.L.C. , Dennis P. McDonough, 219 Greenwood Avenue Dennis P. McDonough,L.L.C. , Dennis P. McDonough, 219 Greenwood Avenue Bridgeport, CT Drapp & Jaumann, LLC , John C. Drapp III, 189 State Street, Fourth Floor Frederick D. Paoletti Jr., Law Offices of , Paul C. Gusmano, 3301 Main Street James O`Neill Ruane, Law Office of , James O`Neill Ruane, 350 Fairfield Ave., Suite 403 Danbury, CT Nina Trester, Law Office Of , Nina Trester, 100 Mill Plain Road Riefberg, Smart, Donohue And NeJame PC , NeJame Karin, 17 Downs Street Norwalk, CT DiScala DiScala And Papcsy , Francis DiScala Jr, 11 North Main Street Sara Clinton Curtis LLC, Law Offices of , Sara Clinton Curtis Esq., 14 Priscilla Road Shelton, CT Sarris Law Firm , William Sarris, Suite 100 273 Canal Street Stamford, CT Abate & Abate, LLC , Charles P. Abate, 607 Bedford Street Stratford, CT Zanella, Boath & Associates, LLC , George W. Boath, Jr., 1129 Essex Place Fairfield County Lawyers in related fields Criminal Defense Lawyers Are you a Lawyer? List on AttorneyPages | Find Expert Witnesses | Find Legal Information / Advice | Legal Forms | About Us | Media AttorneyPages® is not a lawyer referral service and never receives any portion of any attorney's fees.We welcome feedback from visitors but are not responsible for any attorney's advice. Use of AttorneyPages.com is subject to our disclaimer, conditions of use and privacy policy.Use for marketing or solicitation is prohibited. AttorneyPages® , ExpertPages® and FreeAdvice® are trademarks and units of Advice Company ® 1997 to 2006 - All Rights Reserved - For feedback or listing information only, contact us by phone, Fax or Email: 2330 Marinship Way Suite 120, Sausalito, CA 94965, P.O. Box 1739 Sausalito, CA 94966 (415) 331-1212 - Fax (415) 331-4255

Drunk Driving Laws

DUI Lawyers Site Map :: Disclaimer California DUI Laws and Legal Information Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms Specializing in DUI / DWI Defense Alabama Huntsville: Phillip B. Price, Sr. Montgomery: John T. Kirk Alaska Anchorage: Fred Slone Arizona Phoenix and Flagstaff: Edward Loss Sierra Vista: Jeffrey S. Siirtola Tempe: Theodore A. Agnick Tempe: Mark Weingart Tucson: Trezza & McDonald California Chico: Joe Van Dervoort Los Angeles: Lawrence Taylor Napa-Marin-Sonoma: Paul Burglin Orange County: Lawrence Taylor Riverside/San Bernardino Counties: Lawrence Taylor San Diego: Lawrence Taylor San Francisco, San Jose & Oakland: Kapsack & Bair Ventura: Lawrence Taylor Santa Barbara & San Luis Obispo: Darryl Genis Colorado Englewood: James C. Forslund Connecticut Bridgeport: James O. Ruane New London: Steven A. Tomeo Florida Daytona Beach: Flem K. Whited Miami: Richard Essen St. Petersburg: Frank Russo Tampa: Victor J. Pellegrino Ft. Lauderdale: Robert Malove Georgia Atlanta: Chestney & Hawkins Atlanta: William C. "Bubba" Head Atlanta, Athens & Valdosta: J. Michael Mullins Atlanta: George Stein Marietta: Guy Sharpe Toccoa: Sean Black Illinois Chicago: Harold L. Wallin Chicago: Donald Ramsell Oak Park: Andy Sotiropoulos Indiana Indianapolis: J. J. Paul, III Kansas Olathe: Erker, Norton & Hare Wichita: Leslie F. Hulnick Louisiana Covington: Troy G. Broussard Maine Bangor: Wayne Foote Maryland Columbia: Scott Athen Greenbelt: Leonard R. Stamm Rockville: Richard Lurye Silver Springs: Jonathon Katz Massachusetts Brockton: Russell Matson Norwell: Stephen Jones Quincy: Jack Diamond Michigan Grosse Pointe: Theodore E. Bratton Troy: Talpos & Arnold Minnesota Minneapolis: Doug Hazelton Mississippi Jackson: Victor Carmody Missouri Kansas City: Ekker, Norton & Hare Kansas City: David Lurie Nevada Las Vegas: Mace J. Yampolsky New Hampshire Salem: Mark Stevens New Jersey Cherry Hill: Evan M. Levow Freehold: Peter Lederman Livingston: Greggory M. Marootian New York Rochester: Ed Fiandach Rochester: Todd J.W. Wisner North Carolina Charlotte: Charles L. Morgan Durham: Marcus E. Hill Ohio Cleveland: Gardner and Kucharski Columbus: Timothy Huey Columbus: Koffell & Jump Oklahoma Oklahoma City: Charles L. Sifers Oklahoma City: Thomas W. Hosty Oregon Medford: Peter Carini Pennsylvania Montgomery: Margiotti & Mittman Philadelphia: Dessen, Moses and Sheinoff Worcester: David M. Manilla South Carolina Charleston: Reese Joye Tennessee Knoxville: Steven Oberman Knoxville: James A. H. Bell Memphis: Steffen G. Shreiner Texas Austin: Kenneth M. Gibson Houston: John W. Armstrong III Houston: Charles G. Kingsbury Houston: Troy McKinney Houston: J. Gary Trichter League City: Christian C. Samuelson Lubbock: Boatwright & Hamilton South Texas (Corpus Christi): Phillip W. Goff Plano: Christopher N. Hoover Utah Ogden: Glen W. Neeley Washington Bellevue: Douglas Cowan Seattle: George L. Bianchi Wisconsin Milwaukee: Andrew Mishlove Canada Ontario (Missassauga): Stephen R. Biss Ontario (North York): Jonathon Lapid Home :: DUI FAQ's :: Drivers Guide :: Lawyer's Guide :: DUI Research :: DUI Checkpoints The DUI Officer :: DUI Books :: Audio Lectures :: DUI Nationally :: DUI Firms This site is hosted and maintained by: Law.Net ® Return to Top © 1998 Lawrence Taylor :: All Rights Reserved